With premiums rising for some, deductibles going up in many cases, and drug coverage becoming spottier, you might think that Americans would be greatly dissatisfied with the various health insurance companies. Add in the fact that healthcare has been a hot-button political issue and you would have even more reason to expect overall satisfaction with the industry to be down.
In reality, however, the opposite is true. It seems that health insurance companies are not being held responsible by people for the politically divisive issue that healthcare has become. In fact, the latest American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) report [registration required to see full report] covering the insurance sector shows that people are actually happier than they were during the previous two years (but not quite satisfied enough to hit all-time highs).
Why is satisfaction up with health insurance companies?
"ACSI data show that customers gave higher marks for a number of common experiences that contributed to increasing customer satisfaction for health insurers," ACSI Managing Director David VanAmburg told The Motley Fool via email. "The improvements include access to both primary care and specialty doctors, ease of submitting claims, and call center satisfaction."
All the categories that make up the overall ACSI score for healthcare have improved or at least stayed the same. Consumers rated access to primary care an 80 (up from 78 last year) and access to specialty care and hospitals a 78 (up from 77 in 2015). Ease of submitting a claim also climbed to 77 from 75 and coverage of standard medical services moved up from 74 to 76. Even satisfaction with call centers rose, jumping to 73 from 70.
In fact while a few categories, including website satisfaction, timeliness of claim processing, prescription drug coverage, ease of understanding insurance statements, and range of plans available, were flat, it's worth noting that none dropped. These numbers, according to VanAmburg, show that health insurance companies are moving in the right direction.
"Satisfaction isn't all about price," he wrote. "There are a number of other factors that could offset higher prices, like better quality care and better access to doctors."
Good news, but only a piece of the puzzle
Health insurance companies are improving their customer satisfaction rating, but the category is still one of the lowest-scoring ones tracked by ACSI. For example, health insurance outscores internet service providers (64) and cable television (65), but it's well below e-business (74.9), banks (80), and even property insurance (78).
Still, at a time when so much controversy exists over health insurance in general, it's impressive that the industry has continued to improve its customer service. Much more work remains to be done, but this is encouraging, and a sign that despite the political problems facing health insurers, the companies can continue to better serve their customers.
Forget the 2016 Election: 10 stocks we like better than Aetna
Donald Trump was just elected president, and volatility is up. But here's why you should ignore the election:
Investing geniuses Tom and David Gardner have spent a long time beating the market no matter who's in the White House. In fact, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor , has tripled the market.*
David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Aetna wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
Click here to learn about these picks!
*Stock Advisor returns as ofNovember 7, 2016
Daniel Kline has no position in any stocks mentioned. He has decent, not great health insurance. The Motley Fool recommends Anthem. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days . We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.