Purple Background
Investor Relations

How Behavioral Finance And The Analytics Hierarchy Is Reshaping IR

How Behavioral Finance And The Analytics Hierarchy Is Reshaping IR

In the recent whitepaper from Dan Romito, co-Head of Nasdaq Strategic Capital Intelligence, Dan discusses the evolution of the analytics hierarchy and how evidence-based behavioral targeting can better assist IR professionals in their investor targeting strategies.

Corporates navigating the modern dynamics of today’s capital markets may benefit from implementing the principles of behavioral finance into their daily workflow. Behavioral finance integrates conventional finance with the modern facets of psychology in order to map out the mechanics guiding the decision-making process. Capital markets participants are quickly realizing that the customary quant journey only takes you so far. As a result, best practices are being redefined to also incorporate a greater degree of behavioral analysis.

 

  • The emergence of behavioral analytics has created a distinct analytics hierarchy consisting of three buckets: descriptive, predictive and prescriptive.
  • Prescriptive analytics may help improve the accuracy of predictions and provide decision options by concentrating on the attributes displayed in real-time by a set of individuals under the institutional umbrella.

 

For instance, the traditional measure of pitching performance is considered to be the earned run average, or “ERA.” It has proven to be flawed as it does not separate the ability of the pitcher from the abilities of the fielders that he plays with. In other words, ERA is misconstrued as the most telling statistic for teams seeking the best pitcher because it does not take into account the tendencies of that pitcher in certain situations (for example, pressure versus pitching when there is a lead) and it assumes an equal capability of the fielders on each team. This dynamic should strike a chord with the IR community – allowing a false positive to emerge from utilizing broader institutional data rather than intelligence specific to a person. In this example,

 

  • Descriptive analytics would say a pitcher has an ERA of 2.50, so therefore, he is a good pitcher.
  • Predictive analytics would state that because of the 2.50 ERA, the pitcher is going to win 70% of the time.
  • Prescriptive analytics extends beyond the conventional approach by segmenting the players and evaluating tendencies in a mutually exclusive manner. Therefore, prescriptive statistics would affirm that the 2.50 ERA is more a function of the superior fielding capability rather than the overall skill set of the pitcher.
    • Under the prescriptive model, General Managers would seek a pitcher that better fits the team based on his individual tendencies, rather than be overly influenced by the collective stats of their team.

     

     

 

This is analogous to how the dynamic between the three buckets of analytics operates in the IR world:

 

  • Descriptive stats would state that a given investor prefers certain fundamentals such as ROE or margin, which is useless after evaluating the contrary – are there really investors on the planet that do not like margin or ROE?
  • Predictive stats would state that because the institution prefers ROE and margin, they are a 60% match with the corporate. Once again, probabilities based on collective institutional perspective without segmenting individual tendencies are inherently flawed.
  • Prescriptive analytics improves the accuracy of predictions and provides better decision options because it concentrates on the attributes displayed in real-time by a set of individuals under the institutional umbrella. Corporates can pinpoint the person, not the institution, who displays the greatest tendency of meeting with other corporates that resemble their specific investment thesis as well as map out the individual’s investment decision-making process.

 

With evidence-based targeting, corporates can help to eliminate some of the challenges of identifying and prioritizing institutional targets by more finely pinpointing those that offer the greatest opportunity. Moving forward, as IR professionals are increasingly compelled to maintain greater control over their respective narrative, pinpointing the individual investor who represents as close to the best fit possible may be important. Given the assortment of complex macro adjustments, whether it is MiFID II, ESG, the contraction of the sell-side, etc., evidence-based behavioral targeting provides forward-looking analytics that may help to identify where a particular investment thesis lies relative to the established tendencies of any given person.

Download the whitepaper to gain more insight into evidence-based investor targeting.

________________________________________________________________________

NASDAQ IR INTELLIGENCE

Companies across all industries, sectors and regions partner with Nasdaq to maximize the effectiveness of their IR initiatives and enhance shareholder value. Our global team of consultative experts and industry-leading software provide our clients with strategic actionable intelligence and unparalleled visibility into the capital markets for the long term.

Follow us on Twitter: @Nasdaq

Follow us on LinkedIn: Nasdaq

© Copyright 2018 Nasdaq, Inc. The Nasdaq logo and the Nasdaq ‘ribbon’ logo are the registered and unregistered trademarks, or service marks, of Nasdaq, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries. This communication being is provided to you by Corporate Solutions, a business of Nasdaq, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, “Nasdaq”), for informational purposes only and is of general character only. None of the information herein constitutes advice, a recommendation, solicitation, invitation or inducement to buy or sell securities of any kind, or as commentary on the value of any security. Before making any investment decision, you should seek independent legal, taxation or financial advice. Nasdaq makes no representation or warranty with respect to this communication or such content and expressly disclaims any implied warranty under law. At the time of publication, the information herein was believed to be accurate, however, such information is subject to change without notice and Nasdaq makes no representation or warranty as to the correctness or completeness of the information. The information provided in this report remains, unless otherwise stated, the copyright of Nasdaq and may not be used, reproduced, published or copied, in whole or in part, in any form or for any purpose whatsoever without the express written permission of Nasdaq. This information is not directed or intended for distribution to, or use by, any citizen or resident of, or otherwise located in, any jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to any law or regulation or which would subject Nasdaq to any registration or licensing requirements or any other liability within such jurisdiction. By reviewing this document you acknowledge that neither Nasdaq nor any of its third-party providers shall under any circumstance be liable for any lost profits or lost opportunity, indirect, special, consequential, incidental, or punitive damages whatsoever, even if Nasdaq or its third-party providers have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Additionally, unless due to willful tortious misconduct or gross negligence, neither Nasdaq nor any of its third-party providers shall have any liability in tort, contract, or otherwise (and as permitted by law, product liability), to you or any third party. This disclaimer is governed by the laws of the State of New York.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.