Group 1 Automotive (GPI) Hits Fresh High: Is There Still Room to Run?
Shares of Group 1 Automotive (GPI) have been strong performers lately, with the stock up 50.3% over the past month. The stock hit a new 52-week high of $136.35 in the previous session. Group 1 Automotive has gained 26% since the start of the year compared to the 36.7% move for the Zacks Retail-Wholesale sector and the 28% return for the Zacks Automotive - Retail and Whole Sales industry.
What's Driving the Outperformance?
The stock has a great record of positive earnings surprises, as it hasn't missed our earnings consensus estimate in any of the last four quarters. In its last earnings report on July 30, 2020, Group 1 Automotive reported EPS of $3.77 versus consensus estimate of $0.91.
For the current fiscal year, Group 1 Automotive is expected to post earnings of $16.04 per share on $10.93 billion in revenues. This represents a 46.75% change in EPS on a -9.22% change in revenues. For the next fiscal year, the company is expected to earn $15.7 per share on $11.36 billion in revenues. This represents a year-over-year change of -2.11% and 3.92%, respectively.
Group 1 Automotive may be at a 52-week high right now, but what might the future hold for the stock? A key aspect of this question is taking a look at valuation metrics in order to determine if the company is due for a pullback from this level.
On this front, we can look at the Zacks Style Scores, as these give investors a variety of ways to comb through stocks (beyond looking at the Zacks Rank of a security). These styles are represented by grades running from A to F in the categories of Value, Growth, and Momentum, while there is a combined VGM Score as well. The idea behind the style scores is to help investors pick the most appropriate Zacks Rank stocks based on their individual investment style.
Group 1 Automotive has a Value Score of A. The stock's Growth and Momentum Scores are A and A, respectively, giving the company a VGM Score of A.
In terms of its value breakdown, the stock currently trades at 7.9X current fiscal year EPS estimates. On a trailing cash flow basis, the stock currently trades at 8.6X versus its peer group's average of 8.5X. Additionally, the stock has a PEG ratio of 1. This isn't enough to put the company in the top echelon of all stocks we cover from a value perspective.
We also need to consider the stock's Zacks Rank, as this supersedes any trend on the style score front. Fortunately, Group 1 Automotive currently has a Zacks Rank of #1 (Strong Buy) thanks to rising earnings estimates.
Since we recommend that investors select stocks carrying Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy) or 2 (Buy) and Style Scores of A or B, it looks as if Group 1 Automotive meets the list of requirements. Thus, it seems as though Group 1 Automotive shares could have potential in the weeks and months to come.
How Does Group 1 Automotive Stack Up to the Competition?
Shares of Group 1 Automotive have been moving higher, and the company still appears to be a decent choice, but what about the rest of the industry? Some of its industry peers are also looking good, including Titan Machinery (TITN), Penske Automotive Group (PAG), and Asbury Automotive Group (ABG), all of which currently have a Zacks Rank of at least #2 and a VGM Score of at least B, making them well-rounded choices.
The Zacks Industry Rank is in the top 9% of all the industries we have in our universe, so it looks like there are some nice tailwinds for Group 1 Automotive, even beyond its own solid fundamental situation.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (GPI): Free Stock Analysis Report
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG): Free Stock Analysis Report
Titan Machinery Inc. (TITN): Free Stock Analysis Report
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG): Free Stock Analysis Report
To read this article on Zacks.com click here.
Zacks Investment Research
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.