Fitch downgrades China Evergrande's ratings, sees 'probable' default
Adds detail on downgrades, share and bond prices, context
Sept 8 (Reuters) - Fitch Ratings cut the ratings of China Evergrande Group 3333.HK and two of its subsidiaries on Wednesday, the latest in a series of downgrades targeting the indebted property firm.
In a statement, Fitch said it had downgraded the long-term foreign-currency issuer default ratings of Evergrande and subsidiaries Hengda Real Estate Group Co and Tianji Holding Ltd to CC from CCC+. Fitch defines a CC rating as indicating "very high levels" of credit risk.
Fitch also downgraded the senior unsecured ratings of Evergrande and Tianji, as well as the rating on Tianji-guaranteed senior unsecured notes issued by Scenery Journey Limited to C from CCC.
"The downgrade reflects our view that a default of some kind appears probable. We believe credit risk is high given tight liquidity, declining contracted sales, pressure to address delayed payments to suppliers and contractors, and limited progress on asset disposals," Fitch said in the statement.
The move comes after Moody's Investors Service and domestic ratings agency China Chengxin International also downgraded Evergrande's ratings in recent days.
Evergrande's shares fell as much as 3.08% in early trade on Wednesday before trimming losses. Electric vehicle venture China Evergrande New Energy Vehicle Group Ltd 0708.HK fell 10%.
The price of Evergrande's Shenzhen-traded May 2023 bond CN149128=SZ slipped 0.57% on Wednesday morning to 34.8 yuan.
The bond's price has fallen nearly 50% since a downgrade of Evergrande's rating by China Chengxin International last week made the company's onshore bonds ineligible for use as collateral in repo financing transactions.
(Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Bengaluru and Andrew Galbraith in Shanghai; Editing by Muralikumar Anantharaman and Ana Nicolaci da Costa)
((Kanishka.Singh@thomsonreuters.com; +91 8061822801;))
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.