Credit: Shutterstock photoThe Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") recently rejected the request from the Department of Energy to assist the old and financially challenged coal and nuclear power-based plants. The request was to provide 90 days fuel supply on site to coal and nuclear power plants, for increasing the reliability and resilience of the nation's grid.
However, the Federal regulators have rejected the subsidy plan and have provided their opinion relating to resilience of the grid. Per the regulators, continuation of uncompetitive coal and nuclear units will not support the grid. Threat to grid resilience comes primarily from the disruption of the transmission and distribution lines.
President Trump acted on his pre-election promises and has taken steps toward repealing the Clean Power Plan. He believes that such plans will make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive in the global markets. This has helped in running the coal fired electricity generation units for a longer period than previously expected but this new development will definitely hurt the prospects of the units.
Even with the pro-coal plans, the renewable energy and natural gas-based power plants have made continuous inroads in the generation mix in the United States. Per a recent release by the U.S. Energy Information Administration ("EIA"), nearly half of the 25 gigawatt (GW) utility-scale electric generating capacity added to the grid in 2017 came from renewable sources.
So, it is quite evident that alternate energy sources have gained popularity among the utility operators as these hardly create any emission. Also, the costs of operating and setting up alternate energy power plants are dropping each day due to use of new technology. The costs for setting up alternate units are expected to go down further.
The Zacks Solar industry has gained 48.7% last year, outperforming 21.3% return from the S&P 500.
SolarEdge Technologies Inc.SEDG currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here .
The company, along with its subsidiaries, provides solar energy solution to its customers in the United States and around the globe. In a year, the company has returned 171.1%, outperforming 48.7% gain of the industry.
The long-term earnings growth projection (three to five years) is 24%. The company delivered an average positive earnings surprise of 24% in the last four quarters. Its 2018 Zacks Consensus Estimate has moved up 16.1% to $2.23 in the last 90 days.
First Solar, Inc.FSLR a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) stock, designs, manufactures and sells solar electric power modules using a proprietary thin-film semiconductor technology. In a year, the company has returned 99.7%, outperforming 48.7% gain of the industry.
The company delivered an average positive earnings surprise of 537.4% in the last four quarters. Its 2018 Zacks Consensus Estimate has moved up 4.2% to $1.49 in the last 90 days.
Enphase Energy, Inc.,ENPH a Zacks Rank #3 stock, along with its subsidiaries, designs, develops and sells microinverter systems for its international and U.S.-based customers. In a year, the company has returned 66.2%, outperforming 48.7% gain of the industry
The company delivered an average positive earnings surprise of 5.4% in the last four quarters. Its 2018 Zacks Consensus Estimate has moved up to 4 cents from a loss of 6 cents in the last 90 days.
Wall Street's Next Amazon
Zacks EVP Kevin Matras believes this familiar stock has only just begun its climb to become one of the greatest investments of all time. It's a once-in-a-generation opportunity to invest in pure genius.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR): Free Stock Analysis Report
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG): Free Stock Analysis Report
Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH): Free Stock Analysis Report
To read this article on Zacks.com click here.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
