Markets
SO

Exelon Corporation: Nuclear Power Isn't Going Anywhere

Source: Exelon Corporation; Byron nuclear plant.

Exelon Corporation relies on nuclear power for 55% of its capacity -- and that's not going to change any time soon. With nearly 20,000 MW of nuclear power, here's why Exelon will keep packing a powerful punch.

The power disrupter

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, is shaking up the power sector like never before. In June 2014 , the agency announced its Clean Power Plan to limit carbon emissions from existing power plants. Set to be finalized by June 2015, the plan lays the framework for 30% carbon reductions by 2030 from 2005 levels.

Nuclear has been in power purgatory. While some environmentalists, economists, and investors consider nuclear to be a vital part of our nation's power portfolio, others believe its high capital investment costs, necessarily centralized power structure, and radioactive waste make nuclear a "no-go" for our environment and economy. For Exelon, the largest nuclear generator in the United States, this debate decides its financial future.

In Illinois, politicians are paving the way for a nuclear-centric power plan. It's no secret that their decisions are closely interconnected with Exelon's. In an Illinois House resolution issued last May, the document noted that it was "developed on the heels of public statements made by Exelon Corporation that it would consider closing select non-profitable nuclear plants," and that their analysis classifies "at-risk" nuclear plants as those "located in Byron, Clinton, and the Quad Cities identified as unprofitable by Exelon in public statements."

The report's numbers are alarming: $1.8 billion in annual lost economic activity, 7,800 jobs gone, $437 million in electricity price hikes, and an estimated $18 billion in societal costs from actual increases in carbon emissions as Illinois pulls power from dirtier sources. While projections that large should be taken with a shaker of salt, the findings are clear: Nuclear is here to stay. For Exelon, that means avoiding a major monetary shake-up. Nuclear power provided 81% of Exelon's generation output in the same year that its generation unit accounted for 61% of the corporation's $1.73 billion in net profits.

With each state capable of forming its own clean power plan, Exelon's Illinois win is important for other companies, as well. Southern Company relies on nuclear power for 16% of its total generation. With six reactors spread across Alabama and Georgia, Southern Company's nuclear assets are important slices of each state's power pie. In Alabama and Georgia, nuclear energy produces a whopping 76% and 91% of the states' emission-free electricity, respectively. Most importantly, Southern is investing even more in nuclear power. Two new Georgia reactors totaling 2,234 MW are setting Southern back $5 billion. The reactors won't be fully up and running until 2018, meaning decisions on nuclear power today will have significant ramifications for these reactors' value add in a few years.

Source: Southern Company; Vogtle Plant.

Dominion Resources may be best known in investing circles for its natural gas pipelines and export opportunities, but nuclear plays an important role for this Virginia-based utility as well. The company's three power stations across Connecticut and Virginia account for 23% of Dominion's 24,900 MW of generation capacity -- and it used to be more. Dominion shuttered a 556 MW Wisconsin plant in 2013, a decision that it stated was "based purely on economics."

Nuclear for the win?

Nuclear power has had its ups and downs. But for Illinois and Exelon, the EPA's Clean Power Plan solidifies nuclear's role as a relatively emissions-free energy source. Other states will make their own power portfolio decisions, but nuclear is likely to remain an important ingredient in our nation's electricity generation.

The back-door Holy Grail investment into "Oil Boom 2.0"

A single, under-the-radar company has its hands tightly wrapped around both the hydraulic fracturing technology and know-how that has allowed this shale boom to take off in the first place . The Motley Fool just completed a brand-new investigative report on this significant investment topic and the company helping fuel its boom. Simply click here for access .

The article Exelon Corporation: Nuclear Power Isn't Going Anywhere originally appeared on Fool.com.

Justin Loiseau has no position in any stocks mentioned, but he does highly recommend Nuclear Nector Nero Red Hot Sauce. The Motley Fool recommends Dominion Resources, Exelon, Southern Company, and a tall glass of milk after taking Justin's recommendation to try Nuclear Nector Nero Red Hot Sauce. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days . We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .

Copyright © 1995 - 2015 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.


The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

In This Story

SO D EXC

Other Topics

Stocks

Latest Markets Videos

The Motley Fool

Founded in 1993 in Alexandria, VA., by brothers David and Tom Gardner, The Motley Fool is a multimedia financial-services company dedicated to building the world's greatest investment community. Reaching millions of people each month through its website, books, newspaper column, radio show, television appearances, and subscription newsletter services, The Motley Fool champions shareholder values and advocates tirelessly for the individual investor. The company's name was taken from Shakespeare, whose wise fools both instructed and amused, and could speak the truth to the king -- without getting their heads lopped off.

Learn More