Key Highlights
Our monthly ‘ETF 20/20’ report briefly summarizes recent Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) trends globally. It uses data from the First Bridge ETF database that includes all global ETPs.
- Global ETF assets increased by 2.9% in April 2019 to $5.66T.
- On May 20, 2019 the US SEC formally approved the application from Precidian to launch non-transparent active ETFs in the US. The SEC had earlier issued a notice on April 8, 2019 that it intended to approve the application.
- On April 22, 2019, the Japan Exchange Group (JPX) and Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) agreed to establish Japan-China ETF connectivity, with a goal of increasing cross-border investments. The arrangement allows the listing of feeder ETF of ETFs investing in Japanese or Chinese assets.
- There were 31 new listings in the US and 117 new ETF listings (including cross-listings) outside the US in April 2019.
- Gasoline futures, solar equities and recent IPOs were among the best performing ETF categories this year to date through May 17, 2019. VIX, shipping and coffee futures were among the worst performing categories.
About Us
First Bridge provides ETF data and analytics to reputed institutional clients. Our ETF data sets include daily ETF holdings, global ETF product & smart beta classifications, historical distributions and risk metrics. Our clients include asset managers, financial software providers and research firms that use ETF data as a critical input into their systems & workflow. We often provide ‘high touch’ services to our clients in the form of ETF data sets customized to their needs with related support. The First Bridge team combines deep expertise in the Indexing & ETF domain with skills in statistical programming and data visualization.
Email: support@firstbridgedata.com
Phone: (650) 762-9270
Web: http://www.firstbridgedata.com
Global ETPs: Landscape Snapshot
Global ETF assets increased by 2.9% in April 2019 to $5.66T. The table below provides a detailed breakdown by ETF category, and is a summary from the First Bridge ETF data and analytics platform.
ETF / ETP Type |
Assets ($M) - Apr '19 |
Assets ($M) - Mar '19 |
|
|
|
1.1 Broad Market |
278,236 |
275,823 |
1.2 Corporate |
302,150 |
294,619 |
1.3 Municipal |
39,873 |
38,894 |
1.4 Treasury / Sovereign |
259,102 |
256,315 |
1.5 Inflation Protected |
56,135 |
57,901 |
1.6 Specialty / Other |
110,701 |
106,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 Diversified Commodities |
16,144 |
16,227 |
2.2 Agricultural |
1,595 |
1,625 |
2.3 Energy |
5,255 |
5,156 |
2.4 Gold & Metals |
109,076 |
113,326 |
2.5 Other |
153 |
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 Broad Market & Size |
1,276,387 |
1,215,117 |
3.2 Dividend & Fundamental |
135,760 |
130,632 |
3.3 Factor & Thematic |
127,406 |
121,873 |
3.4 Sector & Industry |
368,575 |
357,317 |
3.5 Growth / Value |
403,712 |
387,187 |
3.6 Quant Strategy & Other |
16,724 |
15,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 Broad Market & Regional |
923,130 |
892,509 |
4.2 Country Specific |
694,051 |
674,127 |
4.3 Dividend & Fundamental |
99,553 |
96,120 |
4.4 Factor & Thematic |
145,567 |
140,428 |
4.5 Sector & Industry |
106,015 |
105,468 |
4.6 Quant Strategy & Other |
5,762 |
5,535 |
|
|
|
|
74,802 |
73,411 |
|
|
|
|
79,677 |
87,661 |
|
|
|
|
25,800 |
30,744 |
|
|
|
All Globally Listed ETPs |
5,661,342 |
5,500,294 |
Source: First Bridge Data and individual ETF Sponsors; ETF data as of April 30, 2019
* The Global Equities category includes both International (ex-US) and Global (US + International)
Key ETF Industry Developments
1. SEC formally approves Precidian’s non-transparent active ETF application
On May 20, 2019 the US SEC formally approved the application from Precidian to launch non-transparent active ETFs in the US. The SEC had issued a notice on April 8, 2019 that it intended to approve the application, which it then opened up for public comment. The SEC received two submissions, which argued that the new structure could lead to insider trading. The SEC was not persuaded by the argument that operating this ETF structure involved the unlawful trading on material nonpublic information.
The approval of this structure is an important landmark in the evolution of ETFs, though its success remains to be seen. The key features of this new structure are:
- The active ETF would sell and redeem shares in creation unit sizes to an unaffiliated broker-dealer representative of the Authorized Participant (AP) rather than the AP.
- Since the AP will no longer have visibility into the ETF’s daily constituent holdings, it will need an alternative information mechanism to facilitate arbitrage between the fund units and underlying securities basket. To address this, the active ETF would disseminate a “verified indicative intraday value” every second during the trading day. The AP can then monitor the divergence between the VIIV and the price of the ETF to determine whether to engage in an arbitrage trade.
Active ETFs currently constitute about 2% of ETF assets in the US (see chart below).
2. Japan – China ETF Connectivity announced
On April 22, 2019, the Japan Exchange Group (JPX) and Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) agreed to establish Japan-China ETF connectivity, with a goal of increasing cross-border investments. The arrangement allows the listing of feeder ‘ETF of ETFs’ investing in Japanese or Chinese assets. So, for example, Japanese investors can invest in a Tokyo listed feeder ETF that in turns invests in a Shanghai listed ETF that holds Chinese equities. Additional QFII / RQFII or QDII quotas have been specially created for this program.
April 2019 ETF Launches – US
There were 31 new ETF listings in the US in April 2019. The new listings are summarized in the table below (this is a subset of our complete, regularly updated ETF list).
Table: April 2019 ETF Launches in the US
Type of Exposure |
Sponsor |
Tickers |
Expense Ratios |
(in bps) |
|||
US Equities |
|||
S&P 500 - first 9% loss cap |
Innovator Management |
BAPR:US |
79 |
S&P 500 - first 15% loss cap |
PAPR:US |
79 |
|
S&P 500 - -5% to -35% loss cap |
UAPR:US |
79 |
|
US Big Banks 3X Leveraged |
Bank of Montreal |
BNKU:US |
95 |
US Big Banks 3X Inverse Leveraged |
BNKD:US |
95 |
|
US Big Banks 2X Inverse Leveraged |
BNKZ:US |
95 |
|
US Big Banks 2X Leveraged |
BNKO:US |
95 |
|
US Big Banks Inverse |
KNAB:US |
95 |
|
US Sector Rotation |
State Street |
XLSR:US |
70 |
US Big Oil 3X Leveraged |
Bank of Montreal |
NRGU:US |
95 |
US Big Oil Index 3X Inverse |
NRGD:US |
95 |
|
US Big Oil 2X Leveraged |
NRGO:US |
95 |
|
US Big Oil Index 2X Inverse |
NRGZ:US |
95 |
|
US Big Oil Inverse |
YGRN:US |
95 |
|
Procure Space ETF |
ProcureAM |
UFO:US |
75 |
Sofi Select 500 ETF |
Sofi |
SFY:US |
0 |
Sofi Next 500 ETF |
Sofi |
SFYX:US |
0 |
US Small Cap Covered Call |
Global X |
RYLD:US |
60 |
Global or Ex-US Equities |
|||
India ex-State-Owned Enterprises |
Wisdom Tree |
IXSE:US |
58 |
Genomics & Biotechnology |
Global X |
GNOM:US |
68 |
Emerging Markets ex China |
Krane Shares |
KEMX:US |
49 |
Cloud Computing Theme |
Global X |
CLOU:US |
68 |
Cannabis Theme |
Advisor Shares |
YOLO:US |
74 |
Self-Driving EV and Tech |
Blackrock |
IDRV:US |
47 |
Bonds |
|||
Fixed Income Rotation - Active |
State Street |
FISR:US |
50 |
Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond |
Blackrock |
IBMO:US |
18 |
Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond |
Blackrock |
IBMP:US |
18 |
Ultra Short Bond |
Goldman Sachs |
GSST:US |
16 |
Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond |
Blackrock |
IBMQ:US |
18 |
Senior Loan - Active |
Virtus |
SEIX:US |
57 |
Ultra-Short Income - Active |
Principal |
USI:US |
18 |
ETF List: http://www.firstbridgedata.com; Data as of April 30, 2019
April 2019 ETF Listings – International (Ex-US)
There were 117 new ETF listings outside the US in April 2019 including cross-listings and share class variants. US equity factor exposure, government bonds and corporate bonds were the most launched ETF categories. Wisdom Tree, JP Morgan and Blackrock listed the most ETFs outside the US, including cross-listings.
Chart: Apr ‘19 New ETF Listings by Exposure Type (Ex-US); Total = 117
Chart: Apr ‘19 New ETF Listings by Sponsor (Ex- US); Total = 117
ETF Data Source: www.firstbridgedata.com; As of Apr 30, 2019
Performance of Key Asset Classes & ETF Categories
Gasoline futures, solar equities and recent IPOs were among the best performing ETF categories this year (based on year to date total return through May 17, 2019). VIX, shipping and coffee futures were among the worst performing categories in the same time period. This list does not include leveraged & inverse ETFs, and includes only one ETF from each specific category.
Ticker |
Category |
Year To Date Return |
Volatility |
Best performing ETF categories |
|
|
|
UGA |
Gasoline Futures |
41.16% |
28% |
TAN |
Solar Equities |
36.12% |
26% |
MJ |
Cannabis Equities |
35.44% |
44% |
PTF |
Technology Momentum Equities |
35.16% |
29% |
IPO |
Recent IPOs |
32.80% |
24% |
Worst performing ETF categories |
|
|
|
ULBR |
LIBOR Replication |
-12.72% |
20% |
TUR |
Turkey Equities |
-15.43% |
44% |
JO |
Coffee Futures |
-16.77% |
27% |
BDRY |
Dry Bulk Shipping Futures |
-34.56% |
49% |
EVIX |
Long VIX Futures |
-51.12% |
65% |
Data source: First Bridge Data (http://www.firstbridgedata.com); Data as of May 17, 2019
US bonds (‘AGG”) and gold (‘GLD’) was the best performing of six ETFs representing the major asset classes in the trailing one month through May 17, 2019. Emerging (‘EEM’) and Ex-US developed equities (‘EFA’) were down 9.6% and 2.9% respectively in that time frame.
Data source: First Bridge Data (http://www.firstbridgedata.com); Data as of May 17, 2019
More First Bridge ETF Resources
- ETF Book - ‘ETF Investment Strategies’ (McGraw-Hill): http://amzn.to/19DP5ya
- ETF Analytics Dashboard: http://tradeablebeta.com/
First Bridge maintains granular data sets for all globally listed ETFs, with key metrics. For more information, email: support@firstbridgedata.com
Important Disclaimers
First Bridge Data LLC does not intend this guide to provide investment advice, and the information provided in this guide is not and should not be considered investment advice. First Bridge Data LLC shall not be liable for any actions or decisions made based on the information provided in this document, and the reader assumes all risk associated with any investment decision made based on information contained in this document. First Bridge Data LLC is not a registered investment advisor or broker, and does not recommend specific securities, funds, or investment strategies, nor does it advocate the purchase or sale of any individual investment vehicle. Discussion or references to specific securities or investment products in this book should not be considered endorsements or offers to buy or sell those products. The past performance of a mutual fund or exchange-traded fund (ETF), security, or investment strategy cannot guarantee its future performance.
First Bridge Data LLC has no obligation to update this document or to correct any errors or omissions that might be contained in this document. First Bridge Data LLC disclaims all warranties of any kind, expressed or implied, and hereby disclaim and negate all other warranties, including—without limitation—implied warranties or conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement of intellectual property or other violation of rights. First Bridge Data LLC does not guarantee the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of any data in this document, including any data sourced through third-party content providers. Neither First Bridge Data LLC nor its employees, third-party content providers, nor any person through whom the First Bridge Data LLC makes this document available, shall be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, punitive, special, or consequential damages (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees), whether in an action of contract, negligence, or other tortious action, that result from the use of this book. Neither First Bridge Data LLC nor its content providers shall be liable for any punitive, special, indirect, or consequential damages arising from or relating to the foregoing, whether in contract or tort or otherwise, even if First Bridge Data LLC has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.