Have you been paying attention to shares of e.l.f. Beauty (ELF)? Shares have been on the move with the stock up 4.5% over the past month. The stock hit a new 52-week high of $41.31 in the previous session. e.l.f. Beauty has gained 19.9% since the start of the year compared to the -8.3% move for the Zacks Consumer Staples sector and the -38.2% return for the Zacks Cosmetics industry.
What's Driving the Outperformance?
The stock has a great record of positive earnings surprises, as it hasn't missed our earnings consensus estimate in any of the last four quarters. In its last earnings report on August 3, 2022, e.l.f. Beauty reported EPS of $0.39 versus consensus estimate of $0.23 while it beat the consensus revenue estimate by 12.05%.
For the current fiscal year, e.l.f. Beauty is expected to post earnings of $0.89 per share on $458.18 million in revenues. This represents a 5.95% change in EPS on a 16.84% change in revenues. For the next fiscal year, the company is expected to earn $0.97 per share on $496.4 million in revenues. This represents a year-over-year change of 9.63% and 8.34%, respectively.
e.l.f. Beauty may be at a 52-week high right now, but what might the future hold for the stock? A key aspect of this question is taking a look at valuation metrics in order to determine if the company is due for a pullback from this level.
On this front, we can look at the Zacks Style Scores, as these give investors a variety of ways to comb through stocks (beyond looking at the Zacks Rank of a security). These styles are represented by grades running from A to F in the categories of Value, Growth, and Momentum, while there is a combined VGM Score as well. The idea behind the style scores is to help investors pick the most appropriate Zacks Rank stocks based on their individual investment style.
e.l.f. Beauty has a Value Score of D. The stock's Growth and Momentum Scores are A and C, respectively, giving the company a VGM Score of B.
In terms of its value breakdown, the stock currently trades at 44.9X current fiscal year EPS estimates, which is a premium to the peer industry average of 30X. On a trailing cash flow basis, the stock currently trades at 36.3X versus its peer group's average of 18.6X. This isn't enough to put the company in the top echelon of all stocks we cover from a value perspective.
We also need to look at the Zacks Rank for the stock, as this supersedes any trend on the style score front. Fortunately, e.l.f. Beauty currently has a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy) thanks to rising earnings estimates.
Since we recommend that investors select stocks carrying Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy) or 2 (Buy) and Style Scores of A or B, it looks as if e.l.f. Beauty meets the list of requirements. Thus, it seems as though e.l.f. Beauty shares could have potential in the weeks and months to come.
Just Released: Free Report Reveals Little-Known Strategies to Help Profit from the $30 Trillion Metaverse Boom
It's undeniable. The metaverse is gaining steam every day. Just follow the money. Google. Microsoft. Adobe. Nike. Facebook even rebranded itself as Meta because Mark Zuckerberg believes the metaverse is the next iteration of the internet. The inevitable result? Many investors will get rich as the metaverse evolves. What do they know that you don't? They’re aware of the companies best poised to grow as the metaverse does. And in a new FREE report, Zacks is revealing those stocks to you. This week, you can download, The Metaverse - What is it? And How to Profit with These 5 Pioneering Stocks. It reveals specific stocks set to skyrocket as this emerging technology develops and expands. Don't miss your chance to access it for free with no obligation.>>Show me how I could profit from the metaverse!
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
e.l.f. Beauty (ELF): Free Stock Analysis Report
To read this article on Zacks.com click here.
Zacks Investment Research
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.