Companhia Energetica de Minas GeraisCIG was a big mover last session, as the company saw its shares rise over 6% on the day. The move came on solid volume too with far more shares changing hands than in a normal session. This stock, trading within a volatile range of $2.19 to $2.35 in the past one-month time frame, showed a sharp increase yesterday.
The company has not seen any estimate revisions over the past one month, while the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current quarter hasn't been in a trend either. The recent price action is encouraging though, so make sure to keep a close watch on this firm in the near future.
Companhia Energetica currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), while its Earnings ESP is 0.00%.
Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS Price
Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS Price | Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS Quote
A better-ranked stock in the Utility - Electric Power industry is RWE Aktiengesellschaft RWEOY , which currently sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks here .
Is CIG going up? Or down? Predict to see what others think: Up or Down
The Best & Worst of Zacks
Today you are invited to download the full, up-to-the-minute list of 220 Zacks Rank #1 "Strong Buys" free of charge. From 1988 through 2015 this list has averaged a stellar gain of +25% per year. Plus, you may download 220 Zacks Rank #5 "Strong Sells." Even though this list holds many stocks that seem to be solid, it has historically performed 6X worse than the market. See these critical buys and sells free >>
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS (CIG): Free Stock Analysis Report
RWE AG (RWEOY): Free Stock Analysis Report
To read this article on Zacks.com click here.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
