Credit: REUTERS/CHINA STRINGER NETWORKAdds further comments from CATA statement, compensation requests, context on crashes, expected approval to return to service
BEIJING, May 24 (Reuters) - The China Air Transport Association (CATA) on Friday said it estimates losses at Chinese airlines caused by the grounding of Boeing Co's BA.N 737 MAX aircraft will reach around 4 billion yuan ($579.32 million) by the end of June.
China was the first country to ground the 737 MAX two months ago after a crash in Ethiopia killed 157 people in March, in the second such incident for Boeing's newest aircraft. The U.S. air regulator expects approval for the plane to return to service as early as late June, sources told Reuters on Thursday.
Earlier this week, China's biggest airlines formally asked U.S. planemaker Boeing to compensate them for losses caused by the grounding and delayed deliveries of 737 MAX jets.
"We sincerely hope Boeing will place great importance to the compensation requests made by our member companies and offer solutions in a reasonable and legal manner," said CATA in a statement on its website on Friday.
The association represents 41 Chinese airlines including compensation claimants Air China Ltd 601111.SS, 0753.HK, China Eastern Airlines Corp Ltd 600115.SS and China Southern Airlines Co Ltd 600029.SS.
"We will closely monitor developments and provide proactive and necessary assistance upon request from our member companies, to safeguard their legitimate and lawful rights and interests," the association said.
Chinese airlines had 96 737 MAX jets in operation before the grounding and were due to receive delivery of over 130 more this year, CATA said.
"As time passes, associated losses will further increase," it said.
($1 = 6.9046 Chinese yuan renminbi)
U.S. regulator sees approval of Boeing 737 MAX to fly as soon as late June -sources
China's big three airlines seek Boeing compensation over 737 MAX grounding
(Reporting by Stella Qiu and Beijing Monitoring Desk; Editing by Christopher Cushing)
((yifan.qiu@thomsonreuters.com; 86-10-66271289;))
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
