Markets

Blind Stock Valuation #2: What Would You Pay for This Stock?

Since I wrote my original blind stock valuation over at my old blog, I've gotten a lot of requests to do another one. I think it's a helpful exercise. So I will.

For those who don't know, a blind stock valuation is when I "blind" you to the name of a stock. But I give you most of the important financial numbers. Based on the numbers, you try to value the stock.

Now, with the original blind stock valuation, I tried - unsuccessfully it turned out - to use a stock literally no one could recognize. I picked a water company on the island of Bermuda. Unfortunately, through the power of Google - someone was able to recognize the stock. But it took a lot of work. And most people were truly analyzing the stock blind.

Today, I think I've improved my identification countermeasures. But it's still a real company. And it's still possible you can recognize it. I hope you'll resist the urge to try. And instead analyze this company without any idea what its name is.

It's good practice.

Like last time, I've changed a single identifying detail that would bias you .

(Translation: I'm lying about one thing. And only one thing.)

When you've decided what the stock is worth, send your intrinsic value estimate along with an explanation of how you calculated it to:

[email]geoff@gurufocus.com[/email]

I'll post the best intrinsic value estimates. And explain why I liked them.

And now the stock you'll be valuing blind:

Sales Gross Profit EBITDA EBIT
2001 $44,286,012 $11,460,244 $3,633,007 $3,365,477
2002 $78,014,164 $19,422,785 $6,443,458 $5,983,911
2003 $124,889,141 $31,798,906 $10,302,090 $9,509,399
2004 $167,560,892 $44,222,274 $13,964,474 $12,828,608
2005 $236,209,000 $59,618,000 $15,527,000 $14,008,000
2006 $340,331,000 $88,858,000 $26,666,000 $24,556,000
2007 $478,807,000 $126,138,000 $36,995,000 $33,724,000
2008 $678,456,000 $174,631,000 $49,530,000 $44,459,000
2009 $900,298,000 $239,236,000 $69,295,000 $59,891,000
2010 $1,248,176,000 $328,871,000 $91,752,000 $78,726,000
2011 $1,643,199,000 $435,397,000 $123,063,000 $105,087,000

That's the income statement information you need.

Here's the balance sheet:

Receivables Inventory PP&E Accounts Payable Accrued Expenses
2001 $212,532 $10,654,640 $3,079,607 $3,760,511 $874,688
2002 $434,554 $18,452,663 $7,079,703 $6,807,512 $1,541,421
2003 $1,114,203 $29,427,119 $13,233,161 $8,000,282 $2,378,301
2004 $1,211,168 $41,470,471 $14,656,507 $13,275,531 $3,037,111
2005 $1,407,000 $50,582,000 $19,157,000 $14,090,000 $4,163,000
2006 $2,576,000 $64,371,000 $23,646,000 $17,750,000 $6,560,000
2007 $2,708,000 $88,815,000 $29,169,000 $28,054,000 $8,338,000
2008 $5,449,000 $135,845,000 $44,467,000 $45,427,000 $13,868,000
2009 $5,398,000 $172,640,000 $62,763,000 $65,001,000 $19,411,000
2010 $7,806,000 $235,315,000 $98,760,000 $100,102,000 $34,656,000
2011 $12,666,000 $280,021,000 $116,781,000 $97,445,000 $46,604,000

The company has 32,324,445 shares outstanding.

Do you need anything else?

I don't think so.

Assume the company has no debt. It pays normal taxes. It's a U.S. company. And it's financed entirely with common stock.

How much would you pay per share?

Email your best guess to: [email]geoff@gurufocus.com[/email]

Or post your intrinsic value estimate on my GuruFocus message board .

Or you can Tweet your best guess. But at 140 characters, it'll have to be a concise analysis.

At the start of June, I'll write an article collecting everybody's intrinsic value estimates and discussing the best analysis I got.

Read Geoff's Other Articles

Ask Geoff a Question

Check out the Buffett/Munger: Bargain Newsletter

Check out the Ben Graham: Net-Net Newsletter About GuruFocus: GuruFocus.com tracks the stocks picks and portfolio holdings of the world's best investors. This value investing site offers stock screeners and valuation tools. And publishes daily articles tracking the latest moves of the world's best investors. GuruFocus also provides promising stock ideas in 3 monthly newsletters sent to Premium Members .

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.


The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

In This Story

SPY QQQ