Personal Finance
GS

Bank Earnings Might Look Bad -- Here's Why You Shouldn't Worry

Bank teller greeting a customer.

Earnings season is about to kick off, and the big U.S. banks are among the first companies set to report. Before companies like Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) , Citigroup (NYSE: C) , JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) , and Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) issue their fourth-quarter earnings reports, there's something that bank investors should be aware of -- fourth-quarter bank earnings might look pretty bad at first glance.

However, if you own shares in any bank stocks, this isn't anything to worry about. Here's why the recently passed tax reform bill is expected to hurt fourth-quarter bank earnings and why it's not really a big deal.

Bank teller greeting a customer.

Image source: Getty Images.

Earnings Hit #1: Deferred tax assets

The first reason bank earnings could take a hit is because the deferred tax assets on many banks' balance sheets are now less valuable.

In simple terms, a deferred tax asset is a situation where a company is entitled to lower its taxable income in future years. A common example, especially in banking, is carried losses. When a bank incurs a loss, it is allowed to use that loss to lower its taxable income in subsequent years. There are other ways companies can get deferred tax assets, but the point is that these become less valuable when the tax rate goes down.

Think of it this way. If you can reduce your taxable income by $1 million when the tax rate is 35%, you'll save $350,000 on your tax bill. On the other hand, if the tax rate drops to 21%, you'll only save $210,000. That's why these "assets" become less valuable.

Some banks have pretty large amounts of deferred tax assets on their balance sheets, and the reduction in their value could have a big impact on fourth-quarter earnings. Citigroup, to name a big example, has $46 billion in deferred tax assets on its balance sheet, mainly stemming from the financial crisis. It expects to take a $20 billion charge in the fourth quarter, and analysts estimate that the bank could report a quarterly loss of more than $15 billion.

In another example, Bank of America expects a $3 billion charge, thanks to its $19 billion of deferred tax assets. Other banks will also experience major earnings hits for the same reason.

Earnings Hit #2: Repatriation

Another one-time earnings hit could come from banks that have a lot of foreign profits to bring back to the United States.

The tax reform bill allows companies to repatriate foreign profits at a special, one-time rate of 15.5%. While this is definitely better than the 35% they would have paid if they had brought this money back last year, it's still a large sum of money for some companies.

One bank that is expected to take a major repatriation hit is Goldman Sachs, which had more than $31 billion stashed overseas at the end of 2016, the last full year for which we have finalized data. This will make up the bulk of a $5 billion charge Goldman plans to take in its fourth-quarter earnings.

What banks lose here, they'll more than make up for in the long run

To be clear, tax reform is a very good thing for banks going forward, and any hit they take during the fourth quarter is likely to be made up for and more by the reduced corporate tax rate paid on profits in 2018 and beyond.

Just to give you an idea of how much this could help, these were the effective tax rates for the largest U.S. banks during the third quarter of 2017:

Bank Q3 2017 Effective Tax Rate
Morgan Stanley 28.1%
Goldman Sachs 22.6%
Bank of America 32.6%
JPMorgan Chase 29.6%
Citigroup 31.1%
U.S. Bancorp 27.3%
Wells Fargo 31.2%

Data source: Company earnings reports.

As one example, Bank of America could earn $4.5 billion more in 2019 than it otherwise would have, according to Keefe, Bruyette & Woods analyst Brian Kleinhanzl, which would more than make up for its $3 billion deferred tax asset charge.

The important thing to keep in mind

The bottom line is that the hits banks are going to take in their fourth-quarter earnings, while they will be massive in some cases, are temporary . Meanwhile, the benefits they'll get from the lower corporate tax rate will be permanent , and in most cases, will greatly outweigh the short-term earnings impact.

10 stocks we like better than Wal-Mart

When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, the Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has tripled the market.*

David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Wal-Mart wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.

Click here to learn about these picks!

*Stock Advisor returns as of January 2, 2018

The author(s) may have a position in any stocks mentioned.

Matthew Frankel owns shares of Bank of America. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.


The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

In This Story

GS BAC C

Other Topics

Stocks

The Motley Fool

Founded in 1993 in Alexandria, VA., by brothers David and Tom Gardner, The Motley Fool is a multimedia financial-services company dedicated to building the world's greatest investment community. Reaching millions of people each month through its website, books, newspaper column, radio show, television appearances, and subscription newsletter services, The Motley Fool champions shareholder values and advocates tirelessly for the individual investor. The company's name was taken from Shakespeare, whose wise fools both instructed and amused, and could speak the truth to the king -- without getting their heads lopped off.

Learn More