In recent decades, the airline industry repeatedly burned investors as economic slowdowns or fuel price spikes wiped out industry profits. Many investors, includingWarren Buffett , have suggested that it is best to steer clear of this boom-and-bust industry.
Yet in recent years, the entire airline industry has undertaken a radical overhaul. Debt loads have been pared, labor costs have fallen and the supply of available seats is much more closely aligned with demand. It's time that Buffett and others gave this industry a fresh look. The airliners are now nicely profitable -- in good years and bad -- and their fast-risingshares have furtherupside ahead.
You can look at the improved industry dynamics by poring over thefinancial statements of Delta Airlines (NYSE: DAL ) . I looked at thisstock in the summer of 2011 , noting that shares looked stunningly cheap at just four times projectedfree cash flow . I suggested at the time that shares looked poised to double in value, and that's just what has happened (compared to a 20% rise for the S&P 500 in that time frame).
I took a fresh look at Delta's operating metrics andcash flow potential, and there's no reason for this stock to pause at $16. By the time this rally is over, shares may move up into the lower to mid $20s.
Here's why...
To figure out what this stock is truly worth, let's take a look at free cash flow,balance sheet trends and what Delta may do with its fast-improvingcapital structure . Back in 2011, I wrote that "The carrier generated $1.4 billion in free cash flow (in 2010) and should generate at least a similar amount in (2011)."
Let's take a look at what has actually transpired, along with forward projections.
Delta's Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow slumped in 2012 as Delta spent nearly $2 billion to bolster the business, including the purchase of an oil refinery thatwill save Delta $300 million in annual jet fuel costs. The fact that Delta is expected to generate more than $2 billion in free cash flow next year is simply stunning when you consider that the carrier lost $5 billion in free cash flow from 2004 through 2009.
After the economic slump of 2008, management promised to seek out cost savings under every rock, and boy, are they delivering. The lower cost structure means that even if global air travel slumps badly, Delta is still likely to generate positive free cash flow.
Even Buffett should like that.
Fallingdebt load
Despite that robust free cash flow, shareholders haven't benefited from any share buybacks or dividends. Instead, Delta has been pushing to steadily lower its debt load. Total debt stood at $17.2 billion at the end of 2009, fell to $12.7 billion by the end of 2012 and could reach $10 billion later this year. Once that figure has been reached, management expects to shift gears away from debt reduction and start returning excess cash flow to investors.
It's crucial to understand the roughly $7 billion drop in debt (from the end of 2009 to later this year) in the context of this stock'smarket value . Shares of Delta, as noted earlier, have doubled since the summer of 2011, adding a little less than $7 billion in market value. Paired with the larger drop in debt, that means Delta'senterprise value (or what it would cost to acquire the company outright) is even lower than it was back then.
Delta currently has around $9 billion innet debt (after backing outcash and short-term debt from the $12.7 billion inlong-term debt ). With amarket cap at about $13.5 billion. that adds up to an enterprise value of around $22.5 billion ($9 billion + $13.5 billion), though that figure should fall to just $21 billion by the end of the second or third quarter as Delta pays down more debt. As Merrill Lynch'sanalysts note , the falling enterprise value means that "by nearly every valuation measure, Delta's stock price has never been less expensive."
The company's enterprise value is now less than 10 times projected 2014 free cash flow, which equates to a free cash flowyield in excess of 10%. (Most companies in the S&P 500 have free cash flow yields below 5%.)
Not just cost cuts
Delta's improving financial performance is not solely about expense reductions and debt paydowns. Delta's pricing strategies have also been remarkably impressive. In the past two years, the company has generated a 16% increase inrevenue per average seat mile -- a key airline industry metric -- which leads the industry by a widemargin , according to Merrill Lynch.
Much of thisgain has come from an increased emphasis on higher-paying corporate customers, though international expansion and higher baggage fees have also helped. Presumably, a firming globaleconomy will give Delta -- and the whole industry -- even betterpricing power .
In sum, the vast set of changes that Delta's management has made to thisbusiness model are not simply transitory and instead mark the "new normal" for a once-beleaguered company.
Risks to Consider: A big spike in oil prices remains as the biggest threat to this company and this industry.
Action to Take --> Although Delta will likely earmark just a portion of its free cash flow in 2014 to buybacks and dividends to reduce debt further, look for more robust shareholder returns in subsequent years. Assuming free cash flow stays constant at $2.3 billion into 2015, the company could afford to pay out 80 cents a share in annual dividends. That's the equivalent of a 5% yield at today's prices.
The remaining $1.6 billion in free cash flow could buy back around 100 million shares annually, which would shrink the share count by more than 10% each year. Few investors are talking about this right now, but look for this to become a much-discussed topic later this year once Delta hits its debt targets.
Looking at this stock purely on a price-to-earnings (P/E )basis , shares trade for around 5.5 times projected 2014 profits. Simply moving thatmultiple up to eight gets this stock up to $24 -- or 50% higher than current levels.
-- David Sterman
David Sterman does not personally hold positions in any securities mentioned in this article. StreetAuthority LLC does not hold positions in any securities mentioned in this article.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
© Copyright 2001-2010 StreetAuthority, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
