Markets

1 Way Intel Corp. Will Further Pull Ahead of International Business Machines Corp.

There has been a lot of hype about IBM 's renewed efforts to attack the market for server processors with its OpenPOWER initiative. Interestingly, a while back, I read a column from Seeking Alpha's Mark Hibben that argued that in 2016 IBM might be able to "catch up" to Intel in terms of chip manufacturing technology for its server processors as it migrates to its own 14-nanometer technology.

It would appear, however, that IBM will not do this migration from 22-nanometer (on which its current POWER8 processors are built) in 2016 and will instead not do so until 2017. If anything, it would appear that IBM will fall further behind Intel in terms of chip manufacturing technology in server chips.

Intel already outgunned IBM at 22-nanometer without a "process lead"

Interestingly, both IBM and Intel have been shipping 22-nanometer products in the marketplace, so on the surface it would appear that there is no real gap between the two in terms of manufacturing technology.

Back in November, however, Hibben argued that because Intel implemented the FinFET transistor structure in its 22-nanometer manufacturing technology while IBM hadn't, Intel still had a chip manufacturing edge.

However, there is actually a problem with this analysis. IBM's 22-nanometer process used a technology known as Silicon on Insulator, or SOI, a technology not utilized by Intel in its 22-nanometer technology. Interestingly, both Fully Depleted Silicon on Insulator and FinFETs represent two different approaches to trying to solve the same problem: reducing leakage power.

Image source: Chip equipment vendor Applied Materials.

I would argue at the 22-nanometer generation, both IBM and Intel were effectively at "process parity." This suggests, then, that Intel "won" that particular battle on chip architecture/design and other business factors rather than necessarily chip manufacturing technology.

Intel should gain a process advantage over IBM soon, though

According to an IBM processor road map published in The Next Platform (via Real World Tech forums), IBM plans to introduce a 14-nanometer POWER server processor in the 2017 time frame and a 10-nanometer POWER server chip in the 2020 time frame.

Intel is expected to roll out its first generation of multisocket 14-nanometer Xeon processors in the first half of 2016, and it is generally expected that its second-generation parts will come in the first half of 2017. Assuming that Intel doesn't introduce a server processor family based on its Kaby Lake architecture, we should see Intel transition to 10-nanometer server processors in the first half of 2018.

If Intel does two generations of 10-nanometer server parts, we should see a transition to 7-nanometer server parts in the 2020 time frame; if it does three generations, then I'd expect them in the 2021 time frame.

At any rate, it would appear to me that Intel should be able to gain a manufacturing edge over IBM in server processors and sustain it from here on out.

Don't fret too much about the IBM "threat"

There are many server processor vendors trying to get a piece of Intel's very lucrative data center business, including IBM. Although IBM has been increasingly vocal about its efforts, I continue to believe that Intel will be able to successfully defend itself against any potential incursions from IBM.

3 companies poised to explode when cable dies

Cable is dying. And there are 3 stocks that are poised to explode when this faltering $2.2 trillion industry finally bites the dust. Just like newspaper publishers, telephone utilities, stockbrokers, record companies, bookstores, travel agencies, and big box retailers did when the Internet swept away their business models. And when cable falters, you don't want to miss out on these 3 companies that are positioned to benefit. Click here for their names. Hint: They'renot the ones you'd think!

The article 1 Way Intel Corp. Will Further Pull Ahead of International Business Machines Corp. originally appeared on Fool.com.

Ashraf Eassa owns shares of Intel. The Motley Fool recommends Intel. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days . We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .

Copyright © 1995 - 2016 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.


The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

In This Story

INTC IBM

Other Topics

Stocks

Latest Markets Videos

    The Motley Fool

    Founded in 1993 in Alexandria, VA., by brothers David and Tom Gardner, The Motley Fool is a multimedia financial-services company dedicated to building the world's greatest investment community. Reaching millions of people each month through its website, books, newspaper column, radio show, television appearances, and subscription newsletter services, The Motley Fool champions shareholder values and advocates tirelessly for the individual investor. The company's name was taken from Shakespeare, whose wise fools both instructed and amused, and could speak the truth to the king -- without getting their heads lopped off.

    Learn More