Quantcast

SEC Rule’s Vagueness is Up for Debate


Shutterstock photo
SEC Rule's Vagueness is Up for Debate

(Washington)

Whereas the DOL's first fiduciary rule was highly specific, the SEC's new version of the best interest rule is anything but. The first version of the rule was reasonably vague, such as not defining "best interest", but this new version is even more cloudy. For instance, industry players cannot agree if the rule is stronger or weaker than the last version. Some language has been removed that might make the rule seem weaker, but on the other hand, so much of it is constructed in a manner than tries to use context to make rules, that it is hard to tell. For instance, even the head of trade group Investment Adviser Association says that "People can look at this interpretation and select phrases that concern them or comfort them".

FINSUM : The interesting thing here is that the SEC has deliberately taken the route of making the new rule implicit versus explicit. The whole methodology is designed around not defining things so that they cannot be worked around, but that makes the whole body itself up for interpretation.

  • SEC
  • DoL
  • fiduciary rule
  • best interest

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.





This article appears in: Investing , Wealth Management



More from FINSUM

Subscribe







Contributor:

FINSUM













Research Brokers before you trade

Want to trade FX?