Home > Quotes > RSTI > Guru Analysis > Validea
RSTI

Validea Momentum Guru Analysis for Rofin-Sinar Technologies, Inc.

$22.975
*  
0.085
0.37%
Get RSTI Alerts
*Delayed - data as of Oct. 1, 2014 10:52 ET  -  Find a broker to begin trading RSTI now
Exchange: NASDAQ
Industry: Miscellaneous
Community Rating:
View:    RSTI Real Time
 
 
Symbol List Views
FlashQuotes InfoQuotes
Stock Details
Summary Quote Real-Time Quote After Hours Quote Pre-market Quote Historical Quote Option Chain
CHARTS
Basic Chart Interactive Chart
COMPANY NEWS
Company Headlines Press Releases Market Stream
STOCK ANALYSIS
Analyst Research Guru Analysis Stock Report Competitors Stock Consultant Stock Comparison
FUNDAMENTALS
Call Transcripts Annual Report Income Statement Revenue/EPS SEC Filings Short Interest Dividend History
HOLDINGS
Ownership Summary Institutional Holdings Insiders
(SEC Form 4)
 Save stocks for next time

Analysis Based on September 30, 2014 close price: $23.06

  for the Validea Momentum Strategy based on the criteria of Validea Momentum. Return to RSTI Guru Analysis

All Star Guru Scorecard

Source Go Chart %
Peter Lynch 0%
Benjamin Graham 71%
Validea 0%
Motley Fool 29%
David Dreman 29%
Martin Zweig 38%
Kenneth Fisher 80%
James P. O'Shaughnessy 50%



Detailed Analysis

Guru Score: 0%


QUARTERLY EPS CHANGE (THIS QUARTER VS. SAME QUARTER LAST YEAR): [FAIL]

The EPS growth for this quarter relative to the same quarter a year earlier for RSTI (-23.33%) is below the minimum 18% that this methodology likes to see for a "good" growth company. RSTI fails the first requirement.


ANNUAL EARNINGS GROWTH: [FAIL]

This methodology looks for annual earnings growth above 18%, but prefers higher than 25%. RSTI's annual earnings growth rate over the past five years of -10.18% fails this test.


EARNINGS CONSISTENCY: [FAIL]

According to this methodology, each year's EPS numbers should be better than the previous year's. One dip is allowed, but the following year's earnings should be a new high. RSTI, whose annual EPS before extraordinary items for the last 5 years (from earliest to the most recent fiscal year) were 0.31, 1.02, 2.06, 1.20, 1.22, fails this criterion, as more than 1 dip is unacceptable to the methodology.


LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH RATE RELATIVE TO GROWTH IN THE LATEST 2 QUARTERS: [FAIL]

This methodology looks unfavorably at any company whose earnings growth in the latest 2 quarters has been less than half of the long-term earnings growth rate. RSTI fails this criterion, as earnings growth in the 2 most recent quarters (-38.46% for Q6 to Q2 and -23.3% for Q5 to Q1) have slowed substantially to a point less than its long-term growth rate of -10.2%.


CURRENT PRICE LEVEL: [FAIL]

Investors should keep an eye open for stocks that are trading within 15% of their 52-week highs, as it is likely to continue in its upward trend. RSTI's pricing data is not available, hence an opinion cannot be rendered at the current time.


4 MONTH S&P RELATIVE STRENGTH LINE: [FAIL]

This methodology likes to see confirmation from this indicator when buying as a sign of a company's recently strong momentum. It shows a company's weekly performance in comparison to the overall market, as measured by the S&P 500. Look for a general upward trend in weekly relative strength, as the best stocks usually act better than the overall market. RSTI's relative strength trend has been declining over the last 4 months. This is a negative sign.


PRICE PERFORMANCE COMPARED TO ALL OTHER STOCKS: [FAIL]

A company's weighted relative strength, which is the stock's price performance compared with the overall market over the past year, should be no less than 80, although above 90 is preferred. As long as all the other numbers are in check, these companies should continue to perform well over the next 3 months. RSTI's relative strength of 42 is too low to pass the test.


CONFIRM AT LEAST ONE OTHER LEADING STOCK IN THE INDUSTRY: [PASS]

Make sure that a company's industry is attractive by confirming that at least one other company in the industry has a relative strength above 80. There is confirmation in RSTI's industry (Misc. Capital Goods), as there are 20 companies that have a relative strength at or above 80.


LOOK FOR LEADING INDUSTRIES:


DECREASING LONG-TERM DEBT/EQUITY: [PASS]

Companies who have consistently cut debt over the last 3 years, or who have a Debt/Equity ratio less than 2, are looked at favorably. RSTI, which has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.02%, passes this test.


RETURN ON EQUITY: [FAIL]

Preferred companies must have a ROE of at least 17%. RSTI's ROE of 4.3% is below the minimum 17% that this methodology likes to see, and therefore fails the criterion.


SHARES OUTSTANDING: [PASS]

Shares outstanding should be less than 30 million, as fewer shares mean bigger price jumps when demand surges. However, there is no penalty for a large number of shares outstanding as long as all the other parameters are met. RSTI currently has 28 million shares outstanding, which is favorable.


INSIDER OWNERSHIP: [FAIL]

Companies with the best prospects have strong insider ownership, which we define as 15% or more. When there is strong insider ownership, management is more likely to act in the best interest of the company, as their interests are right in line with that of the shareholders. Insiders own 1.09% of RSTI's stock. Management's representation is not large enough and fails this test.


INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP: [PASS]

Some institutional ownership is preferred, but there is no indication that a large number of institutions is too many. Institutions own 90.57% of RSTI's stock. Because there is some institutional ownership present, RSTI passes this test.

 
The names of individual investment advisors (i.e., the 'gurus') appearing ON THIS WEBSITE are for identification purposes ONLY. The names are used to identify the methodology as derived from the guru's published sources. The names of the individual gurus are not intended to suggest or imply any affiliation with or endorsement of, or even any agreement with the information displayed on this website personally by such gurus, or any knowledge or approval by such persons of the content on this website. All trademarks, service marks and trade names appearing on this website are the property of their respective owners, and are likewise used for identification purposes only.

The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. ("NASDAQ"), its affiliates, third party information providers, or any of these entities' officers, employees, directors, or agents have not: (1) passed on the merit of the information provided on this website or on any of these securities; or (2) endorsed or sponsored any of these securities. ADVICE FROM A SECURITIES PROFESSIONAL IS STRONGLY ADVISED. The information contained on this website is provided for informational purposes only. See Full Disclaimer Below
See Full Disclaimer