|Back to main|
Your Most Important Investing Decision of the Next 10 Years
9/12/2012 11:30:00 AM
By: Carla Pasternak
Think of where you'd be right now if you'd made this move 10 years ago.
The S&P 500 has returned 92% during that time (a 7% average annual gain). Meanwhile, Permian BasinRoyalty Trust (NYSE: PBT ) is up 575% during the same span. Energy Transfer Partners (NYSE: ETP ) has returned 540%. Entertainment Properties Trust (NYSE: EPR ) is showing a return of 302%.
And those are some of the most boring investments you can think of -- REITs, pipeline operators, and royalty trusts. But they all have one thing in common.
They pay solid dividends.
As the Chief Investment Strategist behind High-Yield Investing , I'm biased. But I think dividends are the most powerful tool in investing. You don't have to take my word for it. Other investors agree:
Even John D. Rockefeller once quipped that the only thing that gave him pleasure was to see his dividends coming in.
The simple fact is that how you treat thedividend -- often the forgotten step-child among investors -- is the most important investing decision you'll make today... in the next year... even the next decade.
Let me show you what I mean.
Take two portfolios, each worth $100,000. The first one earns 8% in capital gains each year. The second one earns half that amount in capital gains -- only 4% each year -- but earns a 6% dividend that's reinvested.
I chose these numbers as they illustrate a choice investors can be faced with -- invest in a faster-growing stock that doesn't pay a cent in dividends, or earn a nice yield and see slower growth. Here's the best news -- you'll end up earning more with the dividend, and typically have fewer ups and downs as you would with a riskier growth stock.
In fact, in 10 years your portfolio would be worth $265,089 if you went with the dividend-paying holdings, versus $215,892 with the growth-only portfolio.
Over even longer, the difference is more dramatic.
Wait 20 years and your dividend portfolio would be worth over $702,000 compared to $466,096 -- a difference of more than $200,000.
And here's the best part. The misconception is that dividend payers are boring, stodgy securities. They might pay a few percent, but they won't grow enough to really make a difference.
That couldn't be further from the truth...
But that's during a strong market rally, and coming off of multi-year lows. What about in different conditions?
That's not to say every dividend payer will be a big winner. It won't be, and I wouldn't listen to anyone who says they canguarantee a stock's gains.
But in the sizzle of the mainstream financial media, it's the fast-moving names like Apple and Google that get most of the headlines. As you can see, it may just be the dividend-payers that are most important to your success.
Carla Pasternak does not personally hold positions in any securities mentioned in this article. StreetAuthority LLC does not hold positions in any securities mentioned in this article.