Valero Energy Corporation (VLO)
Q2 2009 Earnings Call Transcript
July 28, 2009 11:00 am ET
Ashley Smith - VP, IR
Mike Ciskowski - EVP and CFO
Rich Marcogliese - EVP and COO
Joe Gorder - EVP, Marketing and Supply
Bill Klesse - Chairman, President and CEO
Jeff Dietert - Simmons
Paul Sankey - Deutsche Bank
Arjun Murti - Goldman Sachs
Paul Cheng - Barclays Capital
Neil McMahon - Sanford Bernstein
Faisel Khan - Citigroup
Chi Chow - Tristone Capital
Mark Gilman - Benchmark Company
Blake Fernandez - Howard Weil
Jason Gammel - Macquarie
Cory Garcia - Raymond James
Previous Statements by VLO
» Valero Energy Corp. Q3 2009 Earnings Call Transcript
» Valero Energy Q1 2009 Earnings Call Transcript
» Valero Energy Corporation Q4 2008 Earnings Call Transcript
Thank you. Mr. Smith. You may begin your conference.
Thank you, Molly. Good morning and welcome to Valero Energy Corporation's second quarter 2009 earnings conference call. With me today are Bill Klesse, our Chairman and CEO; Mike Ciskowski, our CFO; and other members of our executive management team.
If you have not received the earnings release and would like a copy, you can find one on our website at valero.com. Also attached the earnings release are table that provides additional financial information on our business segment. If you have any questions after reviewing these tables, feel free to contact me after the call.
Before we get started, I would like to direct your attention to the forward-looking statement disclaimer contained in the press release. In summary, it says that statements in the press release and on this conference call that states the company's or management's expectations or predictions of the future are forward-looking statements intended to be covered by the Safe Harbor provisions under Federal Securities Laws. There are many factors that could cause actual results to differ from our expectations, including those we've described in our filings with the SEC.
Now, I will turn the call over to Mike.
Thanks Ashley, and thank you for joining us today. As noted in the release, we reported a second quarter 2009 net loss of $254 million or $0.48 per share, which compares to $734 million of net income or $1.37 per share in the second quarter of 2008.
The second quarter 2009 operating loss was $317 million versus $1.2 billion of operating income in the second quarter of 2008. The decrease in operating income was mainly due to the much lower refining margins on diesel and jet fuel and significantly lower sour crude oil discounts versus the same quarter last year.
For example, benchmark Gulf Coast diesel margins versus WTI decreased 79% from $28.85 per barrel in the second quarter of 2008 to $6.16 per barrel in the second quarter of 2009. Regarding crude oil discounts, the Maya heavy sour crude oil discounts versus WTI decreased 78% from $21 in the second quarter of 2008 to $4.57 per barrel in the second quarter of 2009. Also the discounts to WTI on the Mars medium sour crude oil decreased 69% to $2.19 per barrel over the same timeframe.
Our second quarter refinery throughput volume averaged to 2.5 million barrels per day which was in the range of our guidance, but 257,000 barrels per day below the second quarter of 2008. This decrease in volume was mainly due to lower utilization rates, unscheduled downtime of the key and McKee and Delaware City and the reduction in capacity from the sale of the Krotz Springs Refinery in 2008.
We finally cash operating expenses were $4.30 per barrel or $0.10 per barrel below our guidance and $0.23 per barrel below the second quarter 2008, due mainly to lower energy cost, which was partially offset by write-offs on our cancelled projects.
General and administrative expenses excluding corporate appreciation were $124 million in the second quarter. The decrease of $21 million versus the first quarter and $16 million versus our guidance were primarily due to lower expenses or incentive compensation and the legal reserves.
For the second quarter, total depreciation and amortization expense was $389 million, which was in line with our guidance, but higher than the first quarter of 2009, due mostly to the addition of the ethanol plant.
Interest expense net of capitalized interest was $82 million, which was lower than our guidance, mainly due to the reversal of accrued interest on a sales tax audit that settled in our favor.
The effective tax rate was 40%. Considering the loss for the quarter, this rate was favorable to the guidance rate of 31%, due to the use of federal tax credits and state tax benefits.
Regarding cash flows for the second quarter, capital spending was $698 million, which includes $82 million of turnaround and catalyst expenditures. We are still on track to come in around $2.5 billion for the total capital and turnaround cost this year.
Also in the quarter, we paid $78 million in dividends on our common stock and we paid off $209 million of debt that matured in April. And we also acquired the ethanol plants for $556 million, which included working capital.
With respect to our balance sheet at the end of June, total debt was $7.4 billion. We ended the quarter with the cash balance of $1.6 billion, which includes the $799 million of net proceeds from the equity offering in early June and we had over $4.6 billion of additional liquidity available. At the end of the quarter, our debt-to-cap ratio net of cash was 25.9%.
As to the refining outlook, low product margins and narrow sour crude discounts were the key drivers for the second quarter operating loss. Although, product cracks had rebounded recently, we expect refining margins in sour crude discounts for the third quarter to be similar to what we experienced in the second quarter, which means we could have another loss. And the fourth quarter could be just as challenging.