Know when to hold 'em, Kenny Rogers taught us.
Know when to fold 'em.
Know when to walk away.
And know when to run.
Northrop Grumman CEO Wes Bush evidently knows the song. Mr. Bush
has decided to fold and walk away, if not run, from the U.S.
Department of Defense's multibillion-dollar contest to build the
Air Force's new tanker.
Northrup Grumman (
, one of the top defense contractors in the world and the
third-largest in the United States, announced Monday it was
abandoning its bid for the new plane, clearing the way for rival
to win the $40 billion contract.
Boeing shares rose slightly on the news, though the stock is a
clear winner so far this year. Shares are up +25% in 2010, utterly
thumping of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's +1.4% year-to-date
gain and thoroughly trouncing the broader S&P 500 Index , which
Boeing has outpaced by an eye-popping 22.8 percentage points.
The path to this point has not been one of the great stories of
American business. In fact, it's been a long-running and wholly
disastrous soap opera, a cheap melodrama that has kept the military
using refueling aircraft that were built during the Eisenhower
administration. (No joke: The first of the 803 KC-135s the Pentagon
bought took off on Aug. 31, 1956. That's five years before the
current commander-in-chief was even born.)
The troubled tanker contract has encompassed more than just harsh
criticism from lawmakers like Sen. John McCain, who objected to the
terms of the initial deal, which was for the Pentagon to lease the
planes; it has at times degenerated into outright scandal. A Boeing
chief financial officer and a senior Pentagon buyer involved in the
deal actually went to jail over illegal employment talks. Then, in
2008, Northrop won the deal. Boeing complained and won a do-over.
Finally, after years of wrangling, Northrop bowed out.
Wall Street and Washington had been prepared for the possibility of
a single-vendor contract. The question is not what this deal means
for Boeing, the question is what comes next for the aerospace
One possible answer could be India.
India is shopping for a fleet of 126 fighters to defend it from
potential threats in Pakistan or China. The $11 billion deal has
drawn serious competition: Lockheed Martin's F-16, Dassault's
Rafale, the latest Russian MiG-35 and even Sweden's Saab. Boeing's
F/A-18 Super Hornet is also a contender, as is the Eurofighter
Typhoon, a joint project of Germany, Spain, Italy and Great
Britain. The Eurofighter is considered the frontrunner to win the
contract, according to India's ambassador to Italy, though Russia
is typically India's main arms supplier.
We'll know which company will have the contract soon enough: Late
last month, India said it was fast-tracking its procurement efforts
and that the testing phase, during which time the country's
military puts each company's plane through the paces, should wrap
up by the middle of the year.
A handful of emerging countries have made it a top order of
business to bolster their national defenses. India is a
particularly dramatic example given sometimes troubled northern
neighbors like Afghanistan and Pakistan, but the fact is the world
grows smaller and more dangerous every day. This threatens the
wealth and improved standards of living that dozens of small
countries have toiled for decades to achieve. As more countries
seek to protect themselves from aggression, business will continue
to boom for Boeing.
And it's not like business is bad here at home. A $40 billion
contract is a material chunk of business -- Boeing had $68.3
billion in revenue in 2009 -- but even that's a drop in the bucket.
President Obama's overall defense budget for fiscal 2011, which
Congress has yet to finalize, calls for $708.3 billion in Pentagon
appropriations. Or, to put bring the number a little closer to
home, Obama is calling for $7,083 per U.S. household in defense
Only governments can spend money like that.
And companies like Boeing -- the only competitor left standing for
the tanker and one of the finalists for the Indian fighter contract
-- will profit from increased defense spending, both here and
abroad, this year and next, to the benefit of shareholders who
understand how government actions can deliver such strong
Editor: Government-Driven Investing
P.S. I urged my paid subscribers to pick up shares of Boeing
back in September. We're up +32.2% so far and I think we've
got +56% upside from here before hitting my target. If you
want to leverage government action for your own portfolio, you owe
it to yourself to check out my premium service -- including this
"government crisis stock" that could jump +257% in the next year
Disclosure: Andy Obermueller does not own shares of any security
mentioned in this article.