We're here today with Nate Pile who's been publishing his
newsletter for 18 years. How are you doing Nate?
One thing that really sets you apart from any advisors is that you
take a truly long-term perspective; in fact, you've often quoted
Warren Buffett, who said that he focuses on stocks that he wouldn't
mind holding even if the market closed for five years. Could you
tell us a little about this long-term philosophy?
Yeah, and just to be clear, Warren Buffett is one of those guys
like Mark Twain -- he gets a lot of quotes attributed to him that
he didn't necessarily say, but I think it's who I first heard
It's basically this idea that if you find a company you really
like, you ought to be willing to buy it and then find out the stock
market's closed for five years and feel comfortable holding it
through that entire period, knowing it'll probably be worth more at
the end of those five years than when it started, so that's sort of
the basics of the philosophy.
Then we add on to that, but it's just not the buy and hold
strategy, though; the newsletter makes trades once a month and each
issue we sort of look at all the stocks, and we tend to scale in
and out of stocks based on the relative performance of them to each
This sort of naturally leads us to having larger positions in the
stocks that are acting well over time, and smaller positions in the
stocks that aren't acting so well. Again, the caveat on that: Once
we like the stock, we'll never be completely out of it, unless they
go to an outright sell.
So we always have, at least a small position, given that trends can
change on a dime and sometimes, especially in the industries we're
in -- biotech and high-tech -- mostly buyout offers come along and
you hate to be out of your position entirely, so we always own a
little bit of it, but again, we do tend to scale into the stocks
that are acting well and out of the ones that aren't acting so well
One great example of your long-term approach is your investment in
), which rose 100-fold from your original purchase price. Now that
it's come back from the $700 level, down to the low $400s, what's
your outlook for this stock?
Yeah, it was our first 100-bagger and it happened last September.
After it became the 100-bagger, it spent about three more days
heading north and then the great Steve Jobs and the bull market
finally came to an end, and it proceeded to pretty much head
straight down, close to 40% since then.
We started to nibble in the 500s on the way down, but have been
doing a lot more buying down in the low 400s.
I'm a little anxious about the fact that we haven't really seen any
new products out of the company in a while, but they're sitting on
a nice little business franchise, and I think it was David Tepper
who said even if they never knock the ball out of the park again,
they've still got a nice little business to run.
Interestingly, Tim Cook will probably never be the visionary that
Steve Jobs was; you know Steve Jobs is kind of a once-in-a-lifetime
sort of genius, but Tim Cook's a great operations guy, and in a lot
of ways, he came on board just about the right time to take what
Steve had built and start to really run it as a truly efficient
company at its next stage of existence. So, in a lot of ways, I'm
happy with Tim Cook there.
I think the company would really have to mess up to see a huge
decline in the stock, but let's call it downside risk of maybe $50
to $100 from here, but if they are able to come out with a cool
product again, and I think they probably will, the upside's
probably another $400 to $800 from here, and I like that
risk:reward ratio quite a bit, so we're buying the stock down here
in the low 400s.
Biotechnology has been another favorite sector of yours, along with
the technology area. One of your holdings,
), has gone up 150-fold since you bought it. Would you still
recommend buying it even at these highs?
Yep, we still do like Celgene, and that was actually one of the
first stocks recommended in the newsletter way back in 1995. It
took five or six years, I think, to become a 50-bagger, then
another -- gosh, it took all the way until January of this year to
become a 100-bagger for us.
Interestingly - and showing just how frustrating the stock market
can be - whereas Apple hit that milestone for us and promptly
reversed course and dropped close to 50%, Celgene kept right on
truckin' so it was our second 100-bagger in January, and then in
July of this year, it became our first 150-bagger, so it went on to
rise another 50% and we do still like the stock at these prices.
They've got one of the deepest pipelines in the industry, sitting
on plenty of cash and a super great management team there, so the
stock might be due for a little pullback and cooling off period,
but we do still like it and it's one that we plan on owning for
quite a while longer, provided they keep running the ship the way
they've been running it.
Although you keep some 20 stocks in your model portfolio at any
given time, every month in your newsletter you highlight a few that
you consider your top picks for new money. I notice two of the
latest top picks were semiconductor names,
). Could you tell us a little about them?
Yeah, yeah. I watch five indices in the newsletter to help me gauge
the health of the overall market, and the semiconductor index has
been one of the laggards; it was sort of the last one to turn,
flash a bullish signal for us. Not surprisingly, a lot of stocks in
that sector are also starting to perform better. Nvdia and Triquint
are two of them.
Nvidia... their area of specialty is they make basically graphics
processing chips for all the high-end video that you see. There is
a huge slowdown going on in the PC market, obviously, but it seems
to be more dramatic at the low-end than the high-end, and that's
where Nvidia sells into. Triquint also has been in the newsletter
forever; I think we put it in maybe '99 or 2000. It went up
fivefold for us, came back down, and has traded sideways more or
less since then, between five and ten, maybe up to 15... They're
into chips that go into mobile phone units. They do some defense
work and networking, but they're a supplier to the cell phone
They got punished because they're also a supplier to Apple, and, as
you know, anyone who supplies chips to Apple has been crushed right
along with Apple stock lately, but another stock that's looking
good to break into new 52-week, if not two- or three-year highs,
and again, that's something that I look for to add to positions in
our stock, so that's why it was one of the top picks in the most
Editor's Note: This article was written by Steven Halpern for
Below, find some more great investing and trading content from
Cash Flow Growers
Debt Fears Mount in UAE
How to Find Index Yields and More