Stock-Picking Dorsey ETF 'PDP' Gathers Steam


Shutterstock photo

The PowerShares DWA Technical Leaders ETF (NYSEArca:PDP) hit an asset milestone recently when it and three sister funds together reached $1 billion in assets, as noted by my colleague Olly Ludwig.

PDP is the largest of the four DWA Technical Leader ETFs , covering U.S. equities and boasting $771 million in assets. Its assets under management benefited from strong returns in 2012 and, even more so, from net inflows of $200 million in 2012.

I'll dive into the returns in a moment, but the inflows story definitely caught my eye too.

One of 2012's themes was net investor money flowing from mutual funds and into ETFs, the implication being a trend away from actively managed stock selection-i.e., mutual funds-and into staid, passive index investing in the form of ETFs.

However, ETFs like PDP aren't staid or passive. Sure, PDP follows an index. But its underlying index bears little resemblance to a purely passive take on the equity market.

PDP functions more like a "quasi-active" fund, with high portfolio turnover of 96 percent over the last fiscal year, according to the prospectus.

With $200 million in new money into this fund, investors are signaling they're quite comfortable with stock-picking. It's just the high fees and loads that come with some stock-picking mutual funds that they're not so fond of anymore.

PDP charges 67 basis points annually-$67 for every $10,000 invested-which is not cheap compared with some truly passive U.S. equity ETFs, but still less than the all-in costs of many active or quasi-active mutual funds, especially those with loads.

PDP trades and tracks well too, so all-in costs should be very close to its headline fee.


PDP launched in March 2007, so it has a nice long record to evaluate.

I'll use a plain-vanilla, market-cap-weighted fund for comparison; namely, the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (NYSEArca:VTI). VTI makes a good strong benchmark in that it represents the passive market very well, and its all-in cost is dirt cheap.

So how does PDP stack up?

I looked at one-, three- and five-year periods broken neatly by calendar year-just 2012; 2010 through 2012; and 2008 through 2012, respectively.

Don't forget to check's ETF Data section.

Copyright ® 2013 IndexUniverse LLC . All Rights Reserved.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

This article appears in: Investing , ETFs
More Headlines for: PDP , VTI

More from IndexUniverse




Find a Credit Card

Select a credit card product by:
Select an offer:
Data Provided by