Options Trade of the Day: Shorting Gold with Puts and Calls


Shutterstock photo

Gold prices have logged a string of record highs during the past couple of weeks, as the precious metal thrives in the midst of economic uncertainty and volatility in the equities market. At last check, the December gold futures contract was up $3.50 at $1,295.20 an ounce, with many speculators expecting the price to rise above the $1,300 level in short order. However, some options traders are not convinced of gold's staying power, as evidenced by today's flood of put volume on the SPDR Gold Trust ( GLD ).

Monthly chart of gold futures

As I noted in my midday update , GLD has seen more than 54,000 puts cross the tape today, more than doubling the trust's average daily put volume. But, while the weekly September 124 contract has attracted the most attention -- more than 10,000 contracts -- there was a much more interesting transaction that took place at the October 126 strike.

Specifically, a block of 3,300 put contracts traded at the ask price of $1.77 on the Chicago Board Options Exchange ( CBOE ) at about 9:56 a.m. Eastern time. This block was marked "spread." The other half of this trade crossed on the October 126 call, where a block of 3,300 contracts traded at the same time on the same exchange for the bid price of $1.98. Given this data, it would appear that we are looking at a synthetic short position on the SPDR Gold Trust.

GLD October 126 call/put volume details

The Anatomy of a SPDR Gold Trust Synthetic Short

Before we get into the particulars, a synthetic short options trade attempts to replicate as closely as possible a short position on a stock, or, as in this example, an exchange-traded fund ( ETF ). The trader buys at-the-money puts and sells at-the-money calls in equal numbers at the same strike with the same expiration date. By using options, the trader gains considerable leverage, allowing for greater returns on the position than those that would be achieved by investing the same amount of money in a short stock or ETF position.

This particular synthetic short on GLD breaks down as follows: The trader bought 3,300 GLD October 126 puts for the ask price of $1.77. The total debit incurred for entering this position would be $584,100 -- (1.77 * 100) * 3,300 = $584,100. At the same time, the trader sold 3,300 October 126 calls for the bid price of $1.98. The total credit for entering this leg of the position arrives at $653,400 -- (1.98 * 100) * 3,300 = $653,400. Combining this leg of the trade with the purchased October 126 put results in a net credit of $69,300 -- $653,400 - $584,100 = $69,300 -- minus brokerage fees and margin requirements.

GLD synthetic short details

The maximum profit on this trade is equal to the purchased put strike plus the credit received upon entering the position. Since the initiation of the trade resulted in a credit of $0.21, the maximum profit is $126.21, or $12,621 per contract -- $126 + 0.21 = $126.21. Since there is no cap to how high GLD shares can rally, the potential losses are theoretically unlimited. Breakeven, meanwhile, is calculated by adding the net debit to the strike price of the purchased October 126 put, and arrives at $126.21. Below is a chart for a rough visual representation of the trade's profit/loss scenario:

GLD synthetic short profit/loss chart

Implied Volatility

Rising implied volatility is pretty neutral for a synthetic short trade. It lifts the value of both the purchased and the sold options, thus increasing the cost to buy back the sold call and boosting the premium received when selling the purchased put. At the time of the trade, implied volatility for the GLD October 126 call rested at 14.60%, while implieds for the October 126 put were 15.05%. The ETF's one-month historical volatility rested at 23.29% as of the close on Wednesday.

Synthetic Short Versus a Short Sale

On a final note, let's run a quick comparison to see the difference between a synthetic short option position and a short stock trade. For this example, assume that Trader Bob sold 100 shares of GLD short for $126 each, the credit being $12,600 (excluding margin requirements and broker fees). Meanwhile, Trader Joe sold one October 126 call and bought one October 126 put, resulting in a credit of $0.21, or $21 per pair of contracts (again, excluding margin requirements and broker fees). Both traders control 100 shares of GLD, but Trader Bob pocketed $12,600 while Trader Joe banked $21 per pair of contracts, (although Bob still owes his broker 100 GLD shares).

Let's say that GLD closes at $124 per share on October expiration. If Trader Bob closes out his entire position, he would earn $2 per share, resulting in a profit of $200. For Trader Joe, the October 126 call would expire worthless, while the October 126 put would be worth $2. As a result, Trader Joe would earn $2 plus his initial credit of $0.21, bringing his profit on the entire position to $2.21, or $221 per pair of contracts. Now, imagine if Trader Joe had risked the same amount of capital as Trader Bob, and you can see why synthetic short option trades can be quite lucrative for bearish traders.

Click here for the new summer issue of SENTIMENT magazine

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized reproduction of any SIR publication is strictly prohibited.

This article appears in: Investing , Options
More Headlines for: CBOE , ETF , GLD

More from Schaeffer's Investment Research


Schaeffer's Investment Research

Schaeffer's Investment Research

Market News
Follow on:

Find a Credit Card

Select a credit card product by:
Select an offer:
Data Provided by BankRate.com