By
Smith On Stocks
:
Investment Thesis
Although NovaBay (
NBY
) is a small company as judged by its $43 million market
capitalization, it is complex to analyze. It is developing one
molecule, NVC-422, for three separate indications, impetigo, viral
conjunctivitis and urinary encrustation and blockage. While the
molecule is the same, the disease states are quite different as is
the formulation: NVC-422 for impetigo uses a topical gel, for viral
conjunctivitis it is an eye drop and for urinary encrustation and
blockade, it is a liquid instillate. Each of these opportunities
requires a separate, distinct analysis. And to complicate matters
further, NovaBay has just launched a second product, NeutroPhase,
for wound cleansing. Analyzing NovaBay requires the same effort as
analyzing four individualcompanies.
I have written an
extensive report
(over 40 pages) on my website called NovaBay's Robust Clinical
Pipeline Approaches Critical Clinical Trial Results in 2013.
Because of the complexity of this report, I first published on
Seeking Alpha a report that summarized my sales projections and
investment conclusions. I noted in that report that I would
follow-up with four shorter reports, each focusing on one aspect of
the company. For perspective, I would urge readers to refer to my
Seeking Alpha summary
piece
or my website report.
My first follow-up report was on the use of NVC-422 to treat
impetigo. This second follow-up is on NVC-422 development in viral
conjunctivitis. There are no approved drugs for treating viral
conjunctivitis resulting in a significant unmet need and a huge
market opportunity. Success in this indication would be a homerun
for NovaBay.
NovaBay is now conducting a phase IIb/III trial that began in
May 2012 and could report topline results in 4Q, 2013 or 1Q, 2014.
I am cautious on the potential for success in this trial. The
product was previously licensed to Alcon which conducted a phase II
proof of concept trial. The trial had design issues that affected
enrollment and Alcon stopped the trial at a time when only 81
patients were available for evaluation with 42 on NVC-422 and 39 on
control. In this limited sample size, the trial did not meet its
primary endpoint and Alcon decided to give the product back to
NovaBay.
NovaBay has carefully analyzed the data and found some
encouragement from sub-set analysis. There was a particularly
positive signal in a subset of 30 patients with epidemic
keratoconjunctivitis or EKC. Many forms of viral conjunctivitis
resolve on their own, but it is EKC that usually drives a patient
to a physician; it is also highly contagious so that infections can
spread quickly between family members or members of a group.
NovaBay also came up with an enrollment process that should lead to
quicker and more extensive enrollment. The company decided that a
new phase IIb/III trial would have a reasonable chance of
success.
If this trial is successful, NovaBay could probably partner this
product in quick order. I would expect that the terms of the deal,
including the upfront payment could be substantial, perhaps on the
order of $25 to $50 million. Bear in mind that the current market
capitalization is only $37 million. I believe that if this first
trial is successful, NovaBay's partner would have to do a second
confirmatory trial to gain approval. If both trials are successful,
I think marketing in the US and Europe could start in 2016. There
is some chance that Brazil might approve the product on the basis
of one trial that would result in marketing in 2015.
In this report, I outline my assumptions that result in
projections for worldwide sales of $16 million in 2016, $606
million in 2020 and $879 million in 2028; this obviously assumes
success in the clinical trials. I have assumed royalty rates
similar to the Galderma deal. I then discounted the royalties using
a 10% to 15% discount rate to arrive at a net present value of $520
million to $786 million on a pretax basis. Again, the current
market capitalization for NovaBay is $43 million on an after tax
basis.
What Is Conjunctivitis?
Conjunctivitis is an infection of the conjunctiva, the membrane
that lines the whites of the eye and the inner eyelids. It is about
equally caused by bacteria and certain serotypes (variations) of
the adenovirus family. More commonly known as pink eye,
conjunctivitis usually starts in one eye as watering, itching and
irritation. Most cases resolve on their own using only treatments
that rinse and cleanse the eye.
Bacterial conjunctivitis can be treated with antibiotic
eyedrops, but there is no approved treatment for adenoviral
conjunctivitis. Primary care physicians do not have the time or
capability to conduct the tests needed to accurately determine
whether the infection is caused by bacteria or adenovirus so they
must treat empirically based on their clinical judgment. As a
consequence, adenoviral conjunctivitis is often mistakenly treated
with antibiotics which are ineffective.
Conjunctivitis sometimes involves thecornea - the transparent
membrane that covers the iris, pupil, and anterior chamber of the
eye. Adenoviral infections involving the cornea are a more severe
type of infection that is called epidemic keratoconjunctivitis or
EKC. Symptoms include red eye, blurred vision, tearing, discharge,
eyelash matting or crusting and the sensation of a foreign body in
the eye. EKC is highly contagious. One eye is usually infected
first with the infection spreading to the other eye within two to
three days in about 60% of cases. Moreover, half of people in close
proximity such as family or sports team members usually become
infected.
EKC can result in severe vision impairment in infected patients.
In approximately 20-50% of patients, corneal opacities are
developed due to sub-epithelial infiltrates (SEIs) which can cause
blurred vision. Epidemic keratoconjunctivitis is commonly
associated with adenoviral serotypes 8, 19 and sometimes 37.
A Prior Trial of NVC-422 Conducted By Alcon Failed To
Achieve the Primary Endpoints
Alcon, a division of Novartis, licensed NCV-422 for use in
ophthalmology. It then designed and conducted a trial aimed at
gaining approval in adenoviral conjunctivitis. The presumed mode of
action of NVC-422 suggests that it would be effective in
conjunctivitis whether caused by bacteria or adenoviruses. However,
the great unmet medical need is for a treatment for adenoviral
conjunctivitis and running a trial designed to show efficacy for
all types of conjunctivitis would have been prohibitively large and
complex.
The trial that Alcon designed allowed physicians to enter all
patients that they clinically diagnosed as having adenoviral
conjunctivitis. After the patients were enrolled, precise PCR
technology was used to determine if patients actually had
adenoviral infections and the serotype causing it. The study was
planned to identify and evaluate 220 patients with confirmed
adenoviral infection.
After enrolling 452 patients, an interim analysis showed that
only 81 patients (42 on NVC-422 and 39 on control) had adenoviral
infections confirmed by PCR. The primary endpoint of the trial was
to show a 20% difference between NVC-422 and control in eradication
of adenovirus at day 18 after treatment. The trial showed only a 7%
difference and did not meet its primary endpoint. Alcon ended the
trial and shortly afterwards returned the product to NovaBay.
NovaBay is Conducting a New Trial on Its Own
Experienced biotechnology investors have seen that the failure
of a clinical trial does not always spell the end of a drug.
Sometimes, careful analysis of the trial data will point out flaws
in the trial design and identify subsets of patients who benefited
from the treatment. This can lead to the design of a new trial with
a reasonable chance of success.
NovaBay's analysis of the 81 patients with adenoviral infections
in the Alcon trial revealed that 30 had EKC. In this subgroup there
was a 15% difference in viral eradication at day 18, which was
close to the 20% proscribed endpoint. In addition, 92% of EKC
patients treated with NVC-422 reported resolution of blurred vision
versus 50% in the control group and 60% of NVC-422 patients
experienced resolution of SEIs versus only 30% on control. These
were encouraging findings as EKC is the condition that is most
likely to result in severe damage to the vision of infected
patients, and is of primary concern to the ophthalmology
community.
Based on these findings, NovaBay decided to go forward with a
second trial, which began enrollment in May 2012. This is designed
to enroll 450 patients in the US, India and Brazil. One important
difference in this second trial is that patients entering must be
confirmed as having adenoviral conjunctivitis through a test that
takes about ten minutes to perform. This diagnosis must later be
confirmed by a more precise PCR test, but it should result in
almost all enrolled patients having adenoviral infections as
opposed to only 18% in the Alcon trial.
This second trial is also designed to show that NVC-422 is
effective against those serotypes that cause EKC and the goal is to
get this included in the package insert. In actual clinical
practice, physicians will not know if they are treating adenoviral
conjunctivitis caused by serotypes that lead to EKC or for that
matter if the infections are caused by bacteria or adenovirus. They
will elect to treat empirically and in order to make sure that they
are covering all possibilities they will probably use a combination
of a drug approved for bacterial conjunctivitis and NVC-422 to make
sure that they cover EKC.
Enrollment for the new phase II trial called BAYnovation started
in May of 2012 and could complete in mid-2013. Topline results from
the trial could be released in 4Q, 2013 or 1Q, 2014. If the results
are positive, this trial could be considered a pivotal trial, but
the FDA will almost certainly require a second confirmatory trial.
Assuming timelines similar to the first trial, results from the
second trial could be available and an NDA filing made in 2H, 2014.
Again assuming success in the second trial, NVC-422 could be
approved and marketed in 2016.
The Market Opportunity in Conjunctivitis
The addressable market for NVC-422 in conjunctivitis could be
huge although current data on the size of the market is sketchy. If
efficacy against EKC is established in the current trial, it would
be particularly important. Because conjunctivitis is a disease that
resolves most often on its own, it is not a reportable disease to
the CDC and this also prevents reporting of EKC, which often
requires treatment.
In Japan, EKC is considered a reportable disease and there are 1
million cases recorded annually. Extrapolating this incidence to
theU , suggests that there could be as many as 3.7 million cases in
the US. Because of the epidemic nature of EKC, an infection in one
member of a family could lead to other members of the family being
treated resulting in a multiplier effect on the first prescription.
The same reasoning applies to military personnel, sports and other
activities in which there is close physical contact.
Estimates on the size of the global market for conjunctivitis
are shown in the following table:
| Table 1: Global
Conjunctivitis Market |
|
|
US |
Rest of World |
Worldwide |
| Number of patients (millions) |
6 |
30 |
36 |
| Number of units (millions) |
15 |
90 |
105 |
| Price per unit |
$51 |
$13 |
|
| Sales |
|
|
|
| Bacterial conjunctivitis
($millions) |
460 |
770 |
1230 |
| Viral Conjunctivitis
($millions) |
300 |
400 |
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sources: IMS, NovaBay
SmithOnStocks |
|
|
|
The next table summarizes my sales and royalty projections for
the US and International markets. It is possible that there will be
enough patients treated in the Brazilian segment of the phase
IIb/III trial to allow for regulatory submission based on just one
trial and this could lead to a launch and an estimated $5 million
of sales in Brazil in 2015. I think that Japan will require trials
in Japanese patients that would result in commercialization in
2017. In the US, Europe and all other markets, I am assuming
launches in 2016. This, of course, assumes success in the clinical
trials.
Because there are no approved products for viral conjunctivitis,
I think that there would be rapid penetration in both the US and
international markets. I also would expect NVC-422 to be used
widely for treating bacterial conjunctivitis as well because there
is no easy way to determine whether the infection is viral or
bacterial and NVC-422 is probably effective in both.
| Table 2: Sales and
Royalty Projections for NVC-422 in Conjunctivitis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2028 |
| Conjunctivitis Market Size
($millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Worldwide ($millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Viral conjunctivitis |
743 |
758 |
773 |
788 |
804 |
820 |
961 |
| Bacterial Conjunctivitis |
1,305 |
1,331 |
1,358 |
1,385 |
1,413 |
1,441 |
1,689 |
| Total Worldwide |
2,048 |
2,089 |
2,131 |
2,173 |
2,217 |
2,261 |
2,649 |
| US Sales ($millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Viral conjunctivitis |
318 |
325 |
331 |
338 |
345 |
351 |
412 |
| Bacterial Conjunctivitis |
488 |
498 |
508 |
518 |
528 |
539 |
631 |
| Total U.S. |
807 |
823 |
839 |
856 |
873 |
890 |
1,043 |
| Foreign Sales ($millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Viral conjunctivitis |
424 |
433 |
442 |
450 |
459 |
469 |
549 |
| Bacterial Conjunctivitis |
817 |
833 |
850 |
867 |
884 |
902 |
1,057 |
| Total Foreign |
1,242 |
1,266 |
1,292 |
1,318 |
1,344 |
1,371 |
1,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimated Market Share for NVC-422
(%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Worldwide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Viral conjunctivitis |
1.0% |
2.3% |
17.5% |
32.5% |
42.5% |
47.5% |
47.5% |
| Bacterial Conjunctivitis |
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
5.0% |
10.0% |
15.0% |
25.0% |
| US Market Share (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Viral conjunctivitis |
0.0% |
2.5% |
17.5% |
32.5% |
42.5% |
47.5% |
47.5% |
| Bacterial Conjunctivitis |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
5.0% |
10.0% |
15.0% |
25.0% |
| Foreign Market Share (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Viral conjunctivitis |
1.0% |
2.2% |
17.5% |
32.5% |
42.5% |
47.5% |
47.5% |
| Bacterial Conjunctivitis |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
5.0% |
10.0% |
15.0% |
25.0% |
| Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NVC-422 Sales Estimates ($
millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Worldwide Sales ($millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Viral conjunctivitis |
5 |
18 |
135 |
256 |
342 |
390 |
456 |
| Bacterial Conjunctivitis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
69 |
141 |
216 |
422 |
| Total worldwide |
5 |
18 |
135 |
325 |
483 |
606 |
879 |
| US Sales ($millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Viral conjunctivitis |
0 |
8 |
58 |
110 |
146 |
167 |
196 |
| Bacterial Conjunctivitis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
53 |
81 |
158 |
| Total U.S. |
0 |
8 |
58 |
136 |
199 |
248 |
353 |
| Foreign Sales ($millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Viral conjunctivitis |
4 |
10 |
77 |
146 |
195 |
223 |
261 |
| Bacterial Conjunctivitis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
43 |
88 |
135 |
264 |
| Total Foreign |
4 |
10 |
77 |
190 |
284 |
358 |
525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Royalties ($millions) |
1 |
2 |
17 |
27 |
107 |
144 |
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Source: SmithOnStocks,
IMS, NovaBay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Value of NVC-422 Used to Treat
Conjunctivitis
Table 2 assumes that NVC-422 will be partnered in both the US
and international markets. Currently, NovaBay controls all
worldwide rights. I estimate that the royalty rate will be
comparable to that paid by Galderma for the impetigo indication; it
starts at 10% and escalates to 30% on sales above $300 million.
The royalty stream for the period 2016 through 2028 can be
discounted to arrive at a net present value. Using a discount rate
of 10%, the net present pretax value of the royalty stream is $786
million which compares to the current market capitalization of $37
million. Using a discount rate of 15% produces a net present pretax
value of $530 million.
Disclosure:
I am long [[NBY]]. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my
own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no
business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in
this article.
See also
What Is FedEx Telling Us About The Global
Economy?
on seekingalpha.com