On Thursday, investors saw the debut offering of Twitter
) and to put it mildly, it was well received.
The stock appreciated more than 70 percent on its first day of
trading. As impressive as that is, it is behind an offering like
the Container Store (NYSE:
) and Noodles & Co. (NASDAQ:
) that actually doubled in the first day of trading.
It has been a hot IPO market so far this year with the pace of
offering up about 60 percent year over year in the second quarter
and a strong first day performance of most of these deals at
about 17 percent according to Renaissance Capital, an IPO
research firm. That is the highest average first day return in
over a decade as investors have embraced the IPO market with a
Given all the excitement and incredible returns surrounding
the IPO market, should investors be jumping on the bandwagon?
The truth is that if you could get shares in the hot deals, it
would probably be a worthwhile exercise to buy the hot offering
and sell them very quickly into the aftermarket.
The problem lies in the fact that in all likelihood, investors
cannot get an allocation of shares in a popular deal. These
shares are saved for institutions and even some select
individuals that pay an enormous amount of commissions and fees
to their brokers. Most individuals are left with the option of
buying them in the aftermarket.
That's exactly the wrong thing to do, according to the data
collected by Jay Ritter, a professor at the University of
Florida. He looked at IPO returns minus the first day return and
found they badly lagged the overall market and similar size
firms. He looked at the average three year buy-and-hold return
from buying IPO companies after the first day of trading and
found they badly lagged the stock market.
On average, the IPOs trailed the broader market by almost 20
percent over the three year period.
The average first day gain was about 17 percent, so investors
who got the first day gains did okay, but aftermarket buyers
would have been better off in an index fund.
If you have a great relationship with your broker and can
often gain access to IPOs, it probably makes a lot sense to play
the IPO game. If the shares go up right away pocket the money by
selling as soon as you can. Of course many IPOs have a penalty
bid and if you sell too soon, the broker has to give back part or
all of his commissions. In the end, the broker will not be very
happy with you and that could negatively impact your ability to
get future offerings so most of the time individuals will need to
hold through the penalty period to play the IPO game.
If a broker ever calls and offers you IPO shares, it is best
to politely decline. If they have shares available to sell rather
than use as a reward for big commission clients, the deal is most
likely a bust and will fall shortly after the deal closes.
As exciting and profitable as buying IPO issues can be it is a
game most of us will not be able to play on a regular basis.
Chasing shares in the aftermarket after a first day pop has
proven to be a loser's game and can lead to long term
underperformance. When traders engage in this activity, all they
are doing for the most part is providing liquidity for the
institutions that got an allocation to sell their stock at a
If traders do not get an allocation of shares in the offering,
they are usually better off to step aside and wait for the
excitement to settle down and evaluate the stock on its merits as
a candidate for purchase.
IPOs will get a lot of headlines and news chatter, but they do
not really play the big a role in our activities as long term
investors. After the first day price movement they tend to
underperform the market and often these stocks will show up in
the bargain bin after a year or two and may be a better
investment opportunity at that time.
(c) 2013 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment
advice. All rights reserved.
Free Trading Education -
Check out the free events taking place on Marketfy
this week. Spaces are limited. Sign up today.