A lot has been said about low-volatility equities
being all the rage lately, and a look at a fund like the iShares
MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index Fund (NYSEArca:USMV) seems to
suggest that's very much the case.
USMV, an ETF that essentially serves up exposure to
low-volatility names found in the MSCI USA Index, has attracted
$2.41 billion in net assets year-to-date, and now boasts more than
$3.4 billion in total assets accumulated in just 18 months.
By comparison, its nonvolatility-focused counterpart, the
iShares MSCI USA Index Fund (NYSEArca:EUSA) bled nearly $10 million
since the beginning of the year, putting its total assets under
management at a meager $156.2 million. USMV has also outperformed
its counterpart significantly in recent months.
Russell Indexes itself-the provider behind the benchmarks
anchoring the newcomers SPDR Russell 100 Low Volatility ETF
(NYSEArca:LGLV) and the SPDR Russell 2000 Low Volatility ETF
(NYSEArca:SMLV)-put out a note today highlighting how
low-volatility indexes have, indeed, been delivering on their
promise of lower variability than their respective broader
universe, as well as stronger relative returns.
Investors seem to be listening. Demand for low-volatility
strategies is also seen in other funds such as the PowerShares
S&P 500 Low Volatility Fund (NYSEArca:SPLV), which has
attracted a net of $1.30 billion year-to-date, boosting its total
assets to almost $5 billion, while the SPDR S&P 500 ETF
(NYSEArca:SPY) has shed a net of $7 billion in the same time
The launch of the low-volatility SPDRs built around the Russell
1000 and 2000 indexes in February-and their respective growth to
about $6.5 million in assets each-also speaks to that trend.
Russell had an unsuccessful foray as a fund sponsor into this
pocket of the market before, shuttering its funds last October, but
seems to be carving a new footprint as the index provider for the
two State Street funds LGLV and SMLV.
"Concern about market volatility in recent years has spurred
interest in indexes that focus in stocks exhibiting lower
historical variability of returns than their parent indexes,"
Russell Investment Strategies David Koenig said in the note.
"In today's environment of heightened uncertainty, investors
have utilized low volatility strategies in portfolio construction
as a way to help manage portfolio volatility while maintaining
equity market participation," he said.
The Performance Difference
Since Jan. 1, 2013, iShares' USMV has rallied 15.4 percent,
extending what are now gains of more than 18 percent in the past
year. That compares with 10.8 percent year-to-date gains for
PowerShares' SPLV, the pioneer in the space and currently the
biggest low-volatility equities fund on the market, has also seen
gains of more than 15 percent since Jan. 1, compared with SPY's
11.5 percent rise in the same period. In the past 12 months, that
performance stands at a 20 percent gain for SPLV versus a 14
percent gain for SPY.
More importantly, however, is how these funds measure up in
terms of volatility.
While iShares doesn't report standard deviation for a fund
that's less than three years of age, SPLV has reported 8.9 percent
volatility in the past year, compared with 12.8 percent for the
S&P 500 Index.
What's more, SPLV's Sharpe ratio has been roughly twice that of
the S&P 500 in the past year. The Sharpe ratio measures
risk-adjusted returns, meaning it sheds light on whether a fund's
higher returns relative to its peers are the result of too much
additional risk exposure-the higher the ratio, the better the
fund's risk-adjusted performance is.
The Russell indexes benchmarking the latest-to-market SPDRs also
reflect these performance differences.
The Russell 1000 Low Volatility Index and the Russell 2000 Low
Volatility Index have seen year-to-date returns of 14.5 and 9.5
percent, respectively. It's worth noting that the index returns are
not entirely comparable to the fund returns listed above for USMV
and SPLV, because fund returns include tracking error and fees.
That said, Russell said the index returns exceed those of their
respective parent indexes by roughly 4 percentage points and 2
percentage points, respectively.
Russell has also said that its low-volatility 1000 and 2000
indexes have delivered a standard deviation year-to-date that's 1
to 2 percentage points lower than the 11.6 and 15.2 percent
standard deviation the Russell 1000 Index and Russell 2000 Index
have seen since the beginning of the year.
Permalink | 'copy; Copyright 2009 IndexUniverse LLC. All rights
Don't forget to check IndexUniverse.com's ETF Data
2013 IndexUniverse LLC
. All Rights Reserved.