By
Smith On Stocks
:
Investment Opinion
I am reiterating my Buy recommendation on Antares which was
initiated with a report
on December 1, 2011 at a price of $2.59. My price target for 2015
is $11 per share.
Reaction to Recent Price Weakness
Antares
(
ATRS
) has fallen 27% from its closing price of $5.30 on July 16 to a
recent closing price of $3.88 on September 7. Price behavior like
this can presage problems and gives cause for investors to ask if
there are issues with the current business and/or the new product
outlook. I don't think so. I regard this price behavior as "normal"
volatility that goes hand in hand with biotechnology investing. I
think that many investors and hedge funds try to trade
biotechnology stocks aggressively attempting to capture short term
moves. This can often exacerbate price changes on the upside and
downside and this probably played a role in the sharp move up to
$5.30 and then the sharp retraction.
I am not a fan of short term trading. Wayne Gretsky was once
asked why he was arguably the best hockey player ever. He answered,
"others skate to where the puck is, and I skate to where the puck
will be. " This kind of summarizes my approach to Antares. In the
case of Antares, there is not just one puck, but a barrage of
pucks, wh ich is a metaphor for new product introductions. Those
who have followed my work on Antares will understand that I have
focused on what I think the company will look like in 2016 and
beyond, by which time I expect that the company will have put an
impressive number of pucks in the net.
Price Target Thinking
Antares at the current price of $3.88 carries a market
capitalization of $407 million. To put this in perspective, let's
hypothesize some more mature company that is valued on earnings and
is selling at about 14 times projected earnings which is roughly
the P/E ratio for the S&P 500 based on 2012 EPS projections.
This $407 million market capitalization might correspond to a
company that was earning about $30 million on $300 million of
sales. Antares is on track to report sales of $22 million (not
earnings) in 2012. As is the case in biotechnology investing,
investors have bid the price up because of enthusiasm for new
products that should dramatically accelerate growth in the
future.
Antares has an exceptional new product potential, and it is this
on which investors are focused, with particular attention to Vibex
MTX, an injectable methotrexate product for rheumatoid arthritis. I
think that Vibex MTX has the potential to transform Antares. The
company continues to guide that it will file an NDA in 1Q, 2013 and
I expect marketing to begin in mid-2014. (Later in this report, I
review the clinical development progress of this product.). While
Vibex MTX is the crown jewel of the product pipeline, there are six
new injectable and two new products based on gel that could come to
market by 2016; there are likely to be additional products.
The stock price will certainly ebb and flow over the next few
years, and it is clearly ebbing right now. Using my Wayne Gretsky
investment approach, I look through the current weakness focusing
on my price target for Antares in 2015 of $11. This is based on
applying a 25x price earnings ratio to my projection for fully
taxed 2016 EPS of $0.44. The EPS by 2016 are heavily driven by
Vibex MTX in my model and it is the key to the stock at this
point.
I am assuming that Antares decides to make the transition from a
company licensing products on its own to becoming a fully
integrated marketing operation with Vibex MTX being the first
proprietary product. This will entail significant costs for hiring
sales reps and launch expenses in the 2014 period and beyond, but
will allow Antares to potentially capture all of the profits from
products it develops instead of perhaps 20% to 25% when it licenses
a product.
Students of the biotechnology industry understand that the
licensing strategy that Antares has had to follow because of
financial and infrastructure constraints can produce good
investment outcomes. However, the great success stories almost
always are with companies who make the transition to fully
integrated marketing companies. This strategy is usually rewarded
with a premium price to earnings ratio. This along with EPS growth
prospects for a doubling in EPS in 2016 over 2015 and strong
product pipeline prospects should lead to a healthy P/E ratio in
2015. Based on my experience and personal judgment, I am estimating
that in 2015 the market will apply a P/E of 25x to 2016 EPS.
The EPS estimate of $0.44 that I am using for 2016 needs some
explanation. I do not expect that Antares will exhaust its net
operating loss carry-forwards until 2017. Under generally accepted
accounting principles or GAAP, it may pay no taxes until 2017. It
has been my experience that the market normalizes GAAP by making an
adjustment that assumes full taxes are paid. My model shows GAAP
EPS of $0.64 in 2016 and pro forma fully taxed EPS of $0.44. I
apply the 25x P/E ratio to the $0.44 to arrive at my $11 price
target for 2015.
A Detailed Sales Model is Needed to Analyze
Antares
I have struggled to find a way to present my thinking on the
potential for Antares, as there are so many products that are
involved in the investment outlook. In the case of Antares, a
picture or in this case a detailed sales and earnings model is
worth a thousand words.
| Sales Projections for
Antares Pharmaceuticals 2011-2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All numbers are in ($000) |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
| Proprietary products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Vibex MTX (methotrexate) |
|
|
|
15,000 |
50,000 |
75,000 |
| Vibex QST (testosterone) |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Sub-total |
|
|
|
15,000 |
50,000 |
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Self-injection product sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Human Growth Hormone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Injector and consumables sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TevTropin |
3,654 |
5,712 |
6,854 |
7,883 |
8,671 |
9,538 |
| Ferring HGH product |
3,595 |
4,212 |
4,633 |
5,097 |
5,606 |
6,167 |
| JCR HGH product |
381 |
410 |
440 |
473 |
497 |
522 |
| Sub-total |
7,630 |
10,334 |
11,743 |
14,464 |
16,952 |
19,852 |
| Vibex EPI (epinephrine) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5,000 |
13,000 |
| Vibex sumatriptan |
0 |
0 |
2,493 |
2,543 |
2,542 |
2,541 |
| Pen injector (
ANDA
) product sales |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Pen injector-Teva |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Pfizer Undisclosed |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Sub-total |
7,630 |
10,334 |
14,236 |
17,007 |
24,494 |
35,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Royalties from self-injection
products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Human Growth Hormone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TevTropin |
2,498 |
2,758 |
3,196 |
3,658 |
3,768 |
3,881 |
| Ferring HGH product |
174 |
204 |
225 |
247 |
272 |
299 |
| JCR HGH product |
23 |
24 |
26 |
28 |
30 |
33 |
| Sub-total |
2,695 |
2,960 |
3,404 |
3,871 |
3,986 |
4,106 |
| Vibex EPI (epinephrine) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,000 |
7,400 |
| Vibex sumatriptan |
0 |
0 |
792 |
792 |
776 |
761 |
| Pen Injector (ANDA
product)-Teva |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Pen injector-Teva |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Pfizer undisclosed |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Sub-total |
2,695 |
2,960 |
4,196 |
4,663 |
6,763 |
12,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Royalties from gel technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Elestrin |
450 |
488 |
512 |
537 |
564 |
593 |
| Gelnique |
0 |
2,000 |
5,500 |
7,563 |
10,313 |
12,848 |
| NestroGel |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| LibiGel |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Sub-total |
450 |
2,488 |
6,012 |
8,100 |
10,877 |
13,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Developmental revenues |
4,462 |
5,223 |
3,700 |
3,900 |
4,100 |
4,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Licensing revenues |
1,221 |
1,135 |
1,200 |
1,300 |
1,400 |
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total revenues |
16,458 |
22,140 |
29,343 |
49,970 |
97,634 |
141,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| EPS on a GAAP Basis |
(0.04) |
(0.07) |
(0.03) |
(0.02) |
0.25 |
0.64 |
| EPS Assuming 30% tax rate |
(0.04) |
(0.07) |
(0.02) |
(0.02) |
0.17 |
0.44 |
| Fully diluted shares |
99,995 |
105,006 |
106,056 |
107,116 |
108,118 |
109,269 |
Source: SmithOnStocks.com estimates
Let's now take a look at what has been going on with Antares,
and the prospects for 2012 and 2013 according to my sales model. In
2011, sales increased by 28% and management guidance for 2012 is
for a 20% to 30% gain in sales; my estimate calls for 25% growth.
In 2013, led by a full year of royalties from Gelnique and an
anticipated launch of a new injectable generic believed to be
sumatriptan (for migraine headaches), I am estimating a 43%
increase in sales. This indicates that near term sales growth
should continue to impress. However, it is the new product outlook
led by Vibex MTX and complemented by the possible introductions of
at eight or more other new products that is the essence of the
story.
It is highly likely that there will be a number of new injection
products in addition to those disclosed by the company. Because it
uses the 505-b-2 pathway for drug development (explained later in
this report), it has short development timelines. It can choose
from a vast array of generic drugs for which its injection
technology may afford superior efficacy, safety and/or
administration. The technology may also have great promise for
improving the delivery of biologicals which require administration
through injection. Investors may not be aware of a new product
until one or two years before it is ready for regulatory filing. It
may be the case that the impressive new product pipeline we are now
looking at may be even more impressive.
There are some important things to point out about my sales and
earnings model. The first is how important Vibex MTX is to the long
term outlook. In my model, it accounts for over 50% of sales in
2016. You will also notice that the only other new product that I
have shown as making a meaningful contribution is Vibex EPI
(epinephrine) that I project to account for 14% of sales in
2016.
You are probably scratching your heads as to why I have made no
sales projections for six new products in the sales model. The
first reason is that with the exception of Vibex QST (testosterone)
and the contraceptive Nestrogel, Antares has not identified the
active pharmaceutical ingredient in these products. It is hard to
make projections for unknown products aimed at unknown markets.
Intuitively, I think that they can make important contributions,
but I have decided to wait until we have more information before
putting them in my sales model. This injects conservatism and
allows for upside surprise in my model.
In projecting EPS for 2014, 2015 and 2016, I am assuming that
Antares establishes a 30 person sales force to launch Vibex MTX in
mid-2014. I estimate that in 2014 the cost of sales representatives
will be $4 million and that the launch expenses for Vibex MTX will
be $5 million; the same expenses in 2015 are estimated at $5
million and $10 million respectively.
A Company in Transition
The company's business strategy has been based on using its drug
delivery technology to develop products for other companies in
return for milestone and development payments, royalties, and
manufacturing reimbursement. It sold its drug delivery business
based on topical gel formulations, but some legacy products
remain.
To date the company has developed and seen commercialized one
product from its injection technology. This is human growth hormone
that is marketed by three firms, Teva (
TEVA
), Ferring and JCR in three different geographic areas of the
world. Two legacy products from its topical gel delivery business
have been commercialized, Gelnique for female urinary incontinence
and Elestrin for post-menopausal hot flashes.
Antares' current management led by CEO Paul Wotton inherited a
struggling business in 2008 and has done a highly credible job
turning around and growing its drug delivery business. They have
built infrastructure and drug development capability while keeping
cash burn to impressively low levels. Over the last 10 quarters,
the average operating cash burn per quarter was only $1.4 million.
Despite this modest cash burn, the company has been able to build
its strong pipeline of new drugs for partners. Now it is turning to
the development of proprietary products that it completely controls
with the goal of becoming a fully integrated pharmaceutical
company.
It is extremely difficult to develop a great business based on
developing products and licensing them to another company to
market. Let me show why. The development of an auto-injector device
to deliver Teva's Tev-Tropin human growth hormone product was a
transforming event for Antares as it was then cash strapped and
struggling. This was the key factor in turning the company around.
However, a very large share of the profits form Tev-Tropin accrues
to Teva.
I estimate that net sales of TevTropin will reach $56 million in
2012 and that Antares will receive a royalty that is 5% of sales or
$2.8 million. Antares also supplies the Auto-injector and
components on a cost plus basis. I estimate Teva pays Antares $5.2
million which is 50% over costs or a markup of $1.7 million.
Overall, Antares receives $5.5 million before figuring in operating
costs. If Antares had been able to market the product on its own
(which at the time of the 2009 launch was not a possibility), I
estimate that it would receive about $48 million before operating
costs. There is, of course, an offset as operating costs in the
form of selling, marketing and research expenses increase
significantly with a "go it alone" strategy. Even so, the
proprietary strategy is the way that great companies are built.
The CEO of the company, Wotton, stated on a recent conference
call that the future of the company is going to be developing
proprietary products for its own account. In particular, the
development of Vibex MTX is the driving force behind this strategy.
This is the next transforming event for the company that could
change it from a very good company to a great company.
Another product that could be a game changer is the Vibex
injector for testosterone. This was recently identified by Antares
as being the second product that it may develop for its own
account. Antares has estimated that one-third of the usage in a $6
billion US market is from injectable testosterone products. This
indicates that the injectable testosterone market for Vibex
testosterone could be $2 billion. If this product is differentiable
from currently marketed injectable testosterone products, it may
have the potential comparable to Vibex MTX.
The Status of Vibex MTX Clinical Development
The Vibex methotrexate auto-injection system is being developed
under the 505-b-2 pathway. This allows Antares to use information
previously supplied to the FDA through earlier drug filings related
to methotrexate. Antares doesn't have to perform the pre-clinical
and clinical studies that are required for an NDA on a new drug.
Antares only needs to show that the Vibex methotrexate injection
system can deliver drug as effectively as methotrexate given
through subcutaneous or intramuscular injection using a
conventional syringe and needle; this can be shown with
pharmacokinetic studies.
In August of 2011, the results were reported of a
pharmacokinetic study demonstrating equivalency of Vibex MTX to
commercially marketed injectable methotrexate products. This
established pharmacokinetic equivalence at several dosage strengths
of methotrexate. The clinical study met the primary endpoints
providing equivalent performance and comparable safety in the
patients who participated in the study.
The next and final step in the development process is to
determine if Vibex MTX can be delivered safely and effectively at
home by lay caregivers or the patients themselves. Many rheumatoid
arthritis patients have finger and hand deformities that make it
difficult to grip objects. In June of 2012, Antares reported
results from a
simulated
human use
study of 50 patients representing three potential user groups;
rheumatoid arthritis patients, lay caregivers and health care
professionals. All of the participants in the rheumatoid arthritis
group had severe to very severe hand impairment. A simulated
injection was given on days one and seven, which reflects once a
week dosing. The results of this study showed that the Vibex MTX
device is safe and effective for intended users with a greater than
96% simulated injection success rate.
The last phase of development is an
actual
human use
study in just over 100 rheumatoid arthritis patients. The study is
being done in a clinical setting to record the ability of patients
to safely and effectively use the Vibex MTX auto-injector. It is an
open label study in which patients give themselves one injection
and are observed doing so. Audited results should be available by
October of 2012.
Antares said at the last conference call in early August that it
remains on track to file an NDA submission in 1Q, 2013. Approval
could be gained in late 2013 and marketing might begin in early to
mid-2014.
The company will also need to decide whether it will
commercialize the product on its own or through a partnership.
Barring a partnering deal on terms impossible to turn down, I think
that the company will market the product on its own to
approximately 3000 rheumatologists in the United States using 30 to
35 reps.
Disclosure:
I am long ATRS. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my
own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no
business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in
this article.
See also
General Motors: How To Bash GM - A Primer
on seekingalpha.com