Kirk Wilson: The Alberta Bakken Trend
Source: Brian Sylvester of
The run on land in the expanding Alberta Bakken Formation
play has given a leg up to the exploration and production
(E&P) companies that got in early. In this exclusive
The Energy Report,
Senior Analyst Kirk Wilson of Calgary-based Clarus Securities
details the best and the brightest prospects seeking light oil in
the western Bakken.
The Energy Report:
Kirk, please tell us what you typically cover in the oil and gas
I focus on high-growth, undervalued junior and intermediate
O&G names-domestically and internationally. The majority of
the companies I follow are based in Canada, but all companies
that I follow are listed in Canada. They typically have a market
cap range from $25 million to $2 billion.
What issues or trends are driving Canadian E&P companies?
There are a couple of trends and issues that investors need to be
wary of when looking at Canadian names. One is the ability to
secure land on a reasonable basis. Junior and intermediate
companies need to get into plays early to get a large enough land
position before prices increase dramatically. We've seen it
happen in all the main oil resource plays; if a company is not in
early with a low-cost basis on land acquisitions, it gets more
difficult to be able to put together a meaningful land
The economics are another issue. With about 75% of the Western
Canadian Sedimentary Basin being natural gas-charged, finding oil
plays that deliver much higher netbacks is getting more
difficult. There just aren't as many of them out there. Most
juniors have been weighted towards natural gas. However, with the
challenge in gas prices, it makes growth very difficult for
companies that are focused on that commodity because companies
don't have the cash flow to reinvest. The economics of plays are
very important as well, as investors must recognize the capital
that is required to participate in some of these oil-resource
One trend that has been under the radar until recently is the
light oil play in the Alberta Basin Bakken that extends from
Montana into Alberta and Saskatchewan. What's going on there?
The industry is trying to find new places to exploit large oil
resources. The Bakken in Saskatchewan, and even into North
Dakota, has existed for decades, but it was not economically
producible. Horizontal drilling, multi-frack applications and
higher oil prices have made the Bakken a very economic play.
Companies have applied that technology to other known
resources, such as the Cardium play at Pembina, the Viking
Formation, and the Shaunavon formation in southwest Saskatchewan.
Using that technology, the industry is trying to find new
exploration plays. The Alberta Bakken, which stretches from
Alberta into Montana, is one of these new exploration plays. I
categorize it as exploration because there's been a minimal
amount of drilling, so a minimal amount of data. It's still very
There are a lot of analogies and similarities between the
Alberta Bakken and the Williston Basin that allow companies to
put it on their radar screen. It's about 4,500 to 6,000 feet deep
in Alberta and into Montana. It's light oil believed to be 35 to
42 degree American Petroleum Institute (API).
The Alberta Bakken is a good term but it can involve other
formations like the Exshaw, Three Forks and Torquay. It may not
be precisely in the Bakken, but it's in the same geologic age.
Oil prices are now pretty consistently above $65; so, with proven
technology and the ability to gain a meaningful land position,
companies are now exploring and making this a new play that
hasn't really been talked about in the past.
Tell us a little bit more about the drilling economics of heavy
oil versus light oil.
A key consideration when comparing heavy oil and light oil is the
viscosity. Light oil flows more easily than heavy oil, which
means production rates are generally higher. That obviously helps
the economics because there is a larger percentage of oil
produced early in the life cycle of the well.
Then there are the light oil/heavy oil differentials. A
company will receive-and this is a moving figure based on many
variables-$10 to $15 per barrel less for heavy oil than for light
Investors should also consider royalty rates. In Saskatchewan
and Alberta, there are advantageous royalty rates compared to
south of the U.S. border. That advantage comes from royalty
incentives and royalty holidays. For instance, companies
operating in the Blackfeet Nation in Montana pay ~30% royalties
across the board. In Saskatchewan, the first 37,500 barrels incur
2.5% royalties if they're drilled on Crown land. In Alberta, 5%
royalties are paid for 50,000 to 60,000 barrels of initial
That's a remarkable difference.
It really can be huge. Drilling and completion costs to get a
well on-stream in the Viewfield area of Saskatchewan, where it's
a little shallower, could be $1.7 million. The deeper plays down
in North Dakota could be as high as $6.5 million per well.
Alberta and Montana generally cost around $4 million per
The amount of developed infrastructure in those regions also
plays into the economics of a play. The more developed
infrastructure, as in Saskatchewan, the lower the full-cycle
costs. Some areas have no infrastructure at all.
The cost of doing business is lower in Saskatchewan and Alberta
than North Dakota and Montana?
Yes, but one must consider that production rates in North Dakota
are sometimes multiples of those in Saskatchewan. While the costs
are higher, the overall net-present values can also be higher in
North Dakota depending on how much oil is going to be recovered
and how quickly it is going to be recovered.
There are offsetting measures, but I would say Saskatchewan is
probably the most developed, with North Dakota pretty close
What are some companies with exposure to the Bakken in Montana,
Alberta and Saskatchewan?
In North Dakota, there is
Arsenal Energy Inc. (TSX:AEI)
NuLoch Resources Inc. (TSX.V:NLR)
TriOil Resources Ltd. (TSX.V:TOL)
In Montana, there is
Primary Petroleum (TSX.V:PIE)
Rosetta Resources Inc. (
Newfield Exploration Company (
and Anschutz Exploration Corp.
In Alberta, companies targeting the Alberta Basin Bakken
Crescent Point Energy Corp. (TSX:CPG)
, which has perhaps the largest land position. There is also
Murphy Oil Corp. (
Royal Dutch Shell Plc (NYSE:RDS.A)
PetroBakken Energy Ltd. (TSX:PBN)
. On the smaller side,
DeeThree Exploration Ltd. (TSX.V:DTX)
Bowood Energy Inc. (TSX:BWD)
Argosy Energy Inc. (TSX:GSY)
are three juniors that are playing that space.
That's quite a list.
In Saskatchewan, that list can be longer. Crescent Point and
Petrobakken are the two big dogs there. In addition, there's
Legacy Oil & Gas Inc. (
Spartan Exploration Ltd. (
has a big land position for its size; and
Painted Pony Petroleum Ltd. (TSX.V:PPY.A)
is active in the area. Then there are the trusts:
ARC Energy Trust (TSX:AET.UN)
NAL Oil & Gas Trust (TSX:NAE)
Advantage Oil and Gas Ltd. (NYSE:AAV; TSX:AAV)
Could you delve a little deeper into some of those companies?
Primary Petroleum has 190,000 net acres in Montana on two land
blocks. Its western Montana land position is 170,000 acres and
eastern Montana is 20,000 acres. And the company is still adding
land. The company certainly has a very interesting and highly
appealing land base perspective for those formations.
Right now, investors are watching offsetting activity by some
larger companies. Just north of Primary, on the Blackfeet Nation,
wells are being drilled by Rosetta, Newfield and Anschutz.
Rosetta has drilled a number of wells already, and plans to get
to eight wells this year. Obviously, drilling will continue into
the New Year. Newfield also planned for an eight-well program
this year. At least one of those wells is horizontal and is
producing right now, which is a very interesting data point.
Data is being very closely held, but we do have verbal
confirmation from Rosetta that the formation is over-pressured
and oil-saturated. The company estimates that there are 13-15
million barrels of oil in place per section. To put that into
context, in the Viewfield area of Saskatchewan, which is
shallower and not as highly pressured, there are generally 4-5
million barrels of oil in place per section. So, the Alberta
Bakken could contain up to triple the amount of oil in place. The
key will be recovery and production rates. However, we've seen a
lot of encouraging data so far.
Alberta is a little farther away from Primary Petroleum's
lands, but some drilling has taken place and there are a couple
of wells producing just across the border.
Primary's stock was recently trading in the $0.65 range. A
risk evaluation of their resource indicates a $5 potential value.
We don't have a lot of hard data and there are a lot of
assumptions being made in that analysis, but if the play turns
out to be analogous to the Saskatchewan play, there is a case to
be made for at least $5 per share potential value for
Acquiring land can be an issue. Primary's management must have
gotten in on this pretty early to purchase 170,000 continuous
acres in western Montana.
It's a large land position, which is a notable achievement for
Primary as it can be very difficult to put together this size of
land base-it can take several years sometimes.
What are some other companies?
North of the border, DeeThree Exploration signed a joint venture
Encana Corporation (TSX:ECA; NYSE:ECA)
for shallow gas several years ago. By good fortune they have a
land base in southern Alberta, east of Lethbridge. DeeThree
estimates at least 100 of its sections will be prospective for
the Alberta Basin Bakken. In fact, any day now, the company is
going to start drilling its first Bakken well. It's planning to
drill two this year and follow up with at least four in the first
quarter of next year. The company is in very close proximity to a
couple of wells that have been drilled by other industry
participants, such as Crescent Point. DeeThree has potential
value of $2.90 per share if only one of every 10 sections are
prospective for Alberta Basin Bakken. If they have 100 sections
that are prospective, it could be nearly $30 per share of
potential value for the company. That is a large upside for
DeeThree. It needs to prove the play exists on its land, as does
every company that's associated with the Alberta Basin
They need to create some faith. Some companies are shifting from
gas to oil exploration. Where are they finding exploration
The names that we follow are not necessarily shifting. Those
companies had a predetermined goal to be involved in oil resource
However, where some of the shifting is occurring is into the
halo of the Pembina Cardium Formation where many junior companies
are active. Names that we cover in that area include
Daylight Energy Ltd. (TSX:DAY)
Crew Energy Inc. (CR)
, Spartan Exploration and TriOil Resources.
To a certain extent, this is also occurring in the Bakken
outside of Viewfield in southeast Saskatchewan. The companies we
follow there are Spartan Exploration, TriOil Resources and
Arsenal and NuLoch Resources down south in North Dakota. There
are some companies that are chasing the Pekisko Formation, but
it's not as widespread. Crew Energy in southern Alberta and
Second Wave Petroleum Inc. (TSX.V:SCS)
at Judy Creek are notable names.
Novus Energy Inc. (TSX.V:NVS)
is a name we follow that's playing the Viking Formation in
Novus is drilling in the Viking and the wells are coming on
The company has drilled and has production history on at least 16
horizontal wells. There is a good statistical history of what to
expect from a Viking well, between Novus and other industry
Penn West Energy Trust (PWE)
. Penn West is the big dog in the Viking play.
That information allows investors to take a fairly confident
statistical view of what a company is going to get in the Viking.
To be successful, to grow and to show value, a company needs a
fairly large land base. Novus has definitely been a consolidator
of land. The company has taken its land base from around 20
sections to 105 sections in just the last year. The play is also
developed to the point that well intensity is going to be higher
than it was before. This is recognized by Sproule Associates,
which is the main reserve evaluator in the area. Companies
previously believed that they needed three or four wells per
section, but now it's understood that they need at least eight
wells per section.
On that basis, Novus has an inventory of 560 drilling
locations. That could grow if a higher number of wells are
required. This statistic provides a lot of clarity about where
production can go for this company. In the summer, Novus was
producing around 700 barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) a day. It's
now over 1,400 BOE a day. The company has doubled production and
is on its way to 2,000 BOE a day by the end of this year.
That is still a pretty small number.
Pretty small, but growing. For the most part they are delivering
on the growth that they forecast. Novus has done a very good job
of building its land base, and is now getting some good well
Continued well results are the catalyst for further growth?
Yes, and delivering on consistent production, which comes from
being able to meet expected results on a statistical basis.
Let's dig deeper into some other companies that you like.
Spartan Exploration is a junior that is showing a lot of growth
this year. It was at about 400 BOE a day in the beginning of the
year. Now it's up to about 1,800 BOE a day. The company's
guidance indicates that it will be at 3,000 BOE a day by the end
of next year. Spartan is focused on Cardium oil in the near term
and has had very good drilling results there so far. This area
will be the main driver of achieving 3,000 BOE a day.
However, it's the Bakken that may be the real upside catalyst
for Spartan. It has 68 net sections in southeast Saskatchewan.
The company has done minimal drilling on that land at this point.
It is letting others de-risk its lands by drilling nearby or
right offsetting. If it's proven that the Bakken Formation exists
in an economically recoverable way, then Spartan has a very large
land base relative to its size in southeast Saskatchewan. The
potential from that area, which can be more than $8 per share on
a risked basis, is getting very little consideration, if any, in
their current share price.
What about Second Wave's land base?
Second Wave has a large land base at Judy Creek in northwest
Alberta, where it is chasing the Pekisko Formation. It has 144
perspective sections of land, or a well inventory of 600 or more.
The company has identified about 1.3 billion barrels of original
oil in place on its lands. Second Wave is pretty much the only
company playing the Pekisko at Judy Creek, which means the
company doesn't have the same advantage as other companies by
having competitors drilling wells and furthering technology.
Second Wave is doing it pretty much on its own. Even so, the
company has taken production up to 2,000 BOE a day from around
1,200 to 1,400 BOE a day earlier this year. It should be 2,800
BOE a day by the end of this year. That's 50% growth rate since
the summer. There will be a lot more confidence once investors
become comfortable that the company can get consistent production
and recovery rates from these wells. The risk parameters
associated with Second Wave will lessen, and the share price
We've discussed some Canadian and U.S. projects. What are some
interesting plays outside those borders?
Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (NYSE:GTE; TSX:GTE)
is a very interesting one. It's a relatively low-risk stock. It
will basically have a flat production profile from their
Costayaco Field in Colombia for the next two years. That should
give it a lot of cash flow. Judging by current oil prices, Gran
Tierra could be looking at cash flow in the range of $450
million. It also has about $200 million of working capital.
That's a lot of capital to deploy, and the company recently
started ramping up its exploration. It has had some success at
Moqueta and is more actively exploring in southern Colombia. This
month, Gran Tierra will drill its first exploration well in Peru.
That's more high-risk, high-impact exploration. However, the
company is targeting a play that could be as large as 1 billion
barrels. It's got a lot of interesting exploration potential from
Another interesting play is in Namibia.
West Africa is known mainly for their diamonds.
True. Namibia is really not known at all for oil. What's very
interesting is that Brazil and Africa have a historical
UNX Energy Corp. (TSX.V:UNX)
is very closely associated with the Brazilian company HRT
(BM&FBOVESPA: HRT), which is an expert on the South Atlantic
Margins. The company can show a lot of similarities to offshore
Brazil, which has a number of multi-billion barrel
Like the Tupi oil field.
HRT believes the west coast of Africa has similar geology to the
east coast of Brazil. UNX has eight blocks of interest around a
previous discovery called Kudu. On just one of those blocks, the
company has a resource estimate of 2.3 billion recoverable
There are several catalysts for UNX. It is that it's getting
ready to shoot a 3D seismic survey in the first quarter of next
year. Also, the company hopes to get additional resource
estimates on some of its other blocks, and sign up a joint
venture partner to come in and drill. UNX wants to be carried for
the drilling costs as offshore drilling is very expensive.
There are very few places in the world where you can find the
potential for multi-billion barrel oil discoveries. There's a
shorter list still of countries that have stable, democratic
governments. This is one of those opportunities.
Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPS)
is another company that I want to discuss. It's focused in the
Marcellus play in Pennsylvania with joint venture partners
Chesapeake Energy Corp. (CHK)
Statoil ASA (NYSE:STO; OSE:STL)
. Epsilon is being carried for the first $190 million of capital
costs on the Marcellus play. Production from the joint venture
should go from very little up to between 30-45 million cubic feet
per day by the end of next year, and it could go higher. It's
difficult to say at this point as well results in the area keep
Epsilon's lands are in Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania. Many
publications say that this is the best, or one of the two best,
counties for the Marcellus play.
Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. (COG)
drilled three wells there and was producing in excess of 47
million cubic feet per day.
Epsilon is really a no-capital-risk play, counting on the
expertise of two of the biggest and most technically advanced
companies out there being able to deliver results in the
Marcellus. Epsilon is very undervalued, in my opinion.
Well, it is gas.
It is gas, but on an economic basis, the Marcellus is perhaps one
of the top two natural gas plays in North America.
Do you have some parting thoughts for us?
Investors need to be stock pickers. Oil is a stable commodity,
but nothing's perfect and certain in this world. I would not
necessarily look for a rising tide across the board from rising
commodity prices. So, it's important that investors be stock
Kirk Wilson, CFA, is managing director and oil and gas
. He has over 14 years of equity research experience at
Canadian investment banks, and over nine years of oil and gas
industry experience with both domestic and international
operations. Kirk has a B.Comm. from the University of
Want to read more exclusive
interviews like this?
for our free e-newsletter, and you'll learn when new articles
have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with
industry analysts and commentators, visit our
1) Brian Sylvester of The Energy Report conducted this interview.
He personally and/or his family own shares of the following
companies mentioned in this interview: None.
2) The following companies mentioned in the interview are
sponsors of The Energy Report: Novus, Primary and Royal Dutch.
3) Kirk Wilson: ): I personally and/or my family own shares of
the following companies mentioned in this interview: Spartan
Exploration. I personally and/or my family am paid by the
following companies mentioned in this interview: None.
is Copyright © 2010 by Streetwise Reports LLC. All rights are
reserved. Streetwise Reports LLC hereby grants an unrestricted
license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material (i) only
in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but (ii) never
The Energy Report does not render general or specific investment
advice and does not endorse or recommend the business, products,
services or securities of any industry or company mentioned in
From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its
directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as
well as persons interviewed for articles on the site, may have a
long or short position in securities mentioned and may make
purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or
Streetwise Reports LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or
thoroughness of the information reported.
Streetwise Reports LLC receives a fee from companies that are
listed on the home page in the In This Issue section. Their
sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of
18 U.S.C. 1734.
Participating companies provide the logos used in The Energy
Report. These logos are trademarks and are the property of the
Streetwise Reports LLC
P.O. Box 1099
Kenwood, CA 95452
Tel.: (707) 282-5593
Fax: (707) 282-5592