By
Smith On Stocks
:
Investment Overview
Johnson & Johnson (
JNJ
) is a colossus among health care companies with an estimated $68
billion of revenues in 2012 and a current market capitalization of
$188 billion. Its sales are divided into three major business
categories: Pharmaceuticals (38%), Medical Devices and Diagnostics
or MD&D (41%) and Consumer (21%). It is the largest medical
device company in the world and the number eight pharmaceutical
manufacturer. Its consumer business is focused on OTC medications,
skin care and baby care and has numerous iconic brands such as
Johnson's baby shampoo, Band-Aids and Tylenol. JNJ is made up of
250 operating companies doing business in 60 countries.
The analysis of JNJ presents a challenge, at least to me. In
analyzing a company, I like to start at the microeconomic level and
analyze the most important products and then build these pieces one
by one in order to gain a comprehensive view of the whole company.
This can be done with JNJ's pharmaceutical business, but the other
two key business segments defy this analytical approach. MD&D
and Consumer, as comprised, could each be divided into five, ten or
even more businesses. JNJ does not release the metrics needed to
analyze the sub-segments and indeed, JNJ doesn't try to manage
these groups as one entity, but relies on a highly decentralized
management structure. The best way that I can describe JNJ's
MD&D and Consumer businesses is that it is managing a portfolio
of companies. Its executive committee allocates capital to each
business in a manner similar to how portfolio managers allocate
their capital to individual stocks. Analyzing MD&D and Consumer
is more like analyzing the performance of a fund manager; there may
be one or two key factors that can influence growth, but past
performance is usually extrapolated into the future.
There are two broad macro-factors that drive the Pharmaceutical,
MD&D and Consumer businesses. The first is the state of the
world healthcare economy. There is insatiable demand for healthcare
worldwide and the population in developed markets while growing
slowly is aging and creating significant demand for healthcare
products. The issue is not demand in the developed world, but the
ability to pay. In periods like the one we are now in, developed
countries are burdened by unwisely accumulated debt loads that must
now be paid off by unwilling populations. This has forced budget
austerity and healthcare is under pressure as governments try to
restrain spending through reducing utilization and price controls.
Emerging countries provide far less sophisticated healthcare to
their younger, rapidly growing populations and offer tremendous
potential, but their national income levels are low and the still
nascent economies are dependent on trade with developed
countries.
Another issue that makes analysis difficult is the key role that
acquisitions play in corporate growth. JNJ is a cash machine that
has maintained an AAA credit rating even in the current, horrid
economic environment and with the financing of the large Synthes
acquisition. In 2012, I expect that the company will have free cash
flow after capital spending and dividends of $16 billion. If all of
free cash flow were devoted to share repurchase, JNJ could buy back
9% of its outstanding stock each year at current price levels.
The Synthes acquisition is the largest in the company's history
even though its scope relative to JNJ doesn't compare to
mega-acquisitions undertaken by Merck (
MRK
) with Schering-Plough and Pfizer (
PFE
) with Wyeth. The preponderance of deals is smaller, tuck-in
acquisitions. An analyst can't accurately predict the contribution
that acquisitions will make, but they have been important
contributors to growth throughout the company's history and will
almost certainly be in the future. It is just hard (impossible) for
an analyst to account for this in projecting the role of
acquisitions in future results so that analysts will almost always
underestimate growth for the company.
JNJ and other healthcare companies are competing in a very poor
economic backdrop. This could persist for several years, but
eventually the world economy will improve and with it JNJ's
business. The slowdown in the world economies is evident in the
results of all of JNJ's businesses over the last few years. In
addition, all three segments also labored under company specific
issues. Pharmaceuticals suffered from patent expirations on key
products; the medical device business suffered from the sharp drop
in sales of drug eluting stents that caused the company to exit the
business and the ASR hip recall; and the consumer business was hit
by McNeil OTC product recalls. With all of these issues, JNJ has
turned in roughly flat EPS growth over the period 2008 to 2011.
Investment Thesis
I don't see a vibrant world economy in the next few years that
will reduce pressure on healthcare spending and I think that JNJ
will probably show growth in operational sales and earnings for
in-line businesses in the 3% to 5% range. Acquisitions are likely
to increase this rate of growth as a guess by 1% to 2%, but
obviously this is not predictable. So we may be looking at a
company that grows sales by 4% to 7%. EPS aided by share repurchase
and improved operating efficiencies could grow a little faster.
Combining this with a dividend yield of 3.6% produces a potential
total return of 8% to 10%.
JNJ's businesses are each beginning to improve relative to the
trends of the past few years. The pharmaceuticals business suffered
a number of key patent expirations, but this is now behind the
division and it has a promising number of new products. The Synthes
acquisition could add $2 billion of high margin sales to MD&D
in 2012 and $4 billion in 2013; the older core business of MD&D
appears to be stabilizing and perhaps increasing although surgical
procedures, a key driver of results, remain below pre-recession
levels. One of the top priorities in the company is to re-launch
McNeil OTC products in 2013 that were badly affected by
manufacturing issues.
Foreign currency has exerted a heavy impact on 1H, 2012 results
and this will continue in 2H, 2012 and 1H, 2013. The impact reduced
2Q, 2012 corporate sales by 4.2%. If the dollar remains at current
levels the adverse impact on sales in 3Q, 2012; 4Q, 2012: 1Q, 2013
and 2Q, 2013 could be 5%, 4%, 4% and 4% respectively. On the other
hand, the Synthes acquisition could add $0.03 to EPS in 2012 and
$0.10 to $0.15 in 2013
Management gives guidance first on the basis of what results
would be if the dollar were unchanged throughout 2012. Obviously,
the dollar has strengthened dramatically, but this approach is the
best way of judging the operational strength of the company. The
company estimates that on this basis, operational sales results
including the Synthes acquisition will increase to $68.6 to $69.3
billion, up 5% to 6% from $65,0 billion of sales in 2011. It
increased guidance for operating EPS for 2012 during the second
quarter conference call from a range of $5.18 to $5.25 to a range
of $5.25 to $5.32; this was due to the completion of Synthes
acquisition which will be accretive to EPS. However, if currency
exchange rates remain at current levels, management thinks that
reported sales for 2012 could come in at $66.7 to $67.3 billion and
reported EPS at $5.00 to $5.10.
The following table summarizes my five year projections for JNJ
sales and EPS. As I noted before, these numbers may not accurately
reflect the contribution of acquisitions and could be
conservative.
| Table 1: Sales and
Earnings Projections Through 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
| Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pharmaceuticals |
22,406 |
24,366 |
25,876 |
26,920 |
28,337 |
29,767 |
31,521 |
| MD&D |
24,601 |
25,779 |
27,421 |
30,285 |
31,648 |
33,072 |
34,560 |
| Consumer |
14,589 |
14,883 |
14,313 |
15,109 |
15,864 |
16,658 |
17,491 |
| Total Sales |
61,596 |
65,028 |
67,610 |
72,314 |
75,849 |
79,496 |
83,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pharmaceuticals |
|
8.7% |
6.2% |
4.0% |
5.3% |
5.0% |
5.9% |
| MD&D |
|
4.8% |
6.4% |
10.4% |
4.5% |
4.5% |
4.5% |
| Consumer |
|
2.0% |
-3.8% |
5.6% |
5.0% |
5.0% |
5.0% |
| Total Sales |
|
5.6% |
4.0% |
7.0% |
4.9% |
4.8% |
5.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| EPS |
$4.78 |
$5.00 |
$5.05 |
$5.40 |
$5.84 |
$6.31 |
$6.81 |
| % increase |
|
4.6% |
1.0% |
6.9% |
8.1% |
8.0% |
8.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Source: SmithOnStocks
estimates |
|
|
|
|
|
I think that at some point the world economy will put its debt
woes behind and we will see a resurgence of growth. I think that
JNJ is beautifully positioned to take advantage of this
particularly in emerging markets. It has established operations
that provide low cost older technologies that these countries can
now afford. As their economies build over time and national income
grows, they will be able to incorporate more sophisticated
technologies and JNJ has the infrastructure and innovative products
to participate in this growth. I believe that world economic growth
will be led by the emerging markets over the next two decades and
that JNJ is an investment play on that economic mega-trend.
During the last quarter conference call, the new CEO Alex Gorsky
made some interesting comments on emerging markets. He said that
"JNJ operates in 60 countries and touches more than 1 billion
patients and customers around the world, but helping the next 1
billion people will not be so easy. Many live in the developing
world, and have very different needs than traditional customers.
Income levels while growing rapidly are lower, unmet healthcare
needs abound, indeed demand for healthcare in these markets is
growing three or four times faster than developed markets. JNJ
continues to see double-digit year over year sales growth in the
BRIC markets. In this new world, JNJ's focus will be on expanding
its footprint to help more people and on delivering healthcare in
economical and sustainable ways."
JNJ is currently selling at a price earnings ratio of 13.5 times
2012 EPS and 12.7 times 2013 EPS. Guessing where P/E ratios may go
in the future is a hazardous exercise. However, I think that the
macro and micro economic problems of the past few years have
battered the P/E ratio to the extent that I don't think there will
be a contraction. If so, the stock price would grow in line with
EPS at about 7% to 8% per year. This combined with the 3.6%
dividend yield would produce a total investment return of 11% to
12% per year.
I know that some investors will yawn at the prospect of a total
return of 11% to 12%, even with the potential for acceleration if
the world economy revives. However, I think that this will be an
above market average return and for those who are running a
balanced portfolio with a stable of companies that should be able
to provide sustainable earnings growth augmented by some
speculative stock choices (my portfolio actually), JNJ can be an
anchor in that portfolio.
Pharmaceuticals
The pharmaceuticals business is in the early stages of a
turnaround that promises good growth for the next five years driven
by a strong line-up of new drugs, limited patent expiration
exposure and a valuable infrastructure for taking advantage of high
growth in emerging markets. JNJ believes it could launch as many 18
new drugs in the 2009 to 2016 period. Because of the lack of patent
loss exposure, management can focus significant cash flow on the
product launches without worrying about the need to maintain
margins.
The pharmaceutical business is perhaps most notable for what it
doesn't have, that is there are no major patent expirations
currently or over the next few years in sharp contrast to
Bristol-Myers Squibb (
BMY
), Eli Lilly (
LLY
), Merck and Pfizer. The absence of this negative is a huge
positive.
JNJ is in a very favorable position for acquiring products
through licensing or through acquisition as are BMY, LLY, MRK, PFE
and other multinational pharmaceuticals. There are a plethora of
innovative products being developed by small biotechnology firms.
However, the rigors and time required in gaining FDA approval and
the increasing difficulty and slow product uptake in product
launches makes commercialization a foreboding challenge for most of
small companies. Increasingly the business model for these
companies is to get their products through phase IIb proof of
concept trials and then license the product or sell the company
outright. JNJ has a reputation as a highly desirable partner and is
looking each year at a veritable smorgasbord of exciting new
products. (This also holds true in its other business
segments.)
The company came out of its 2008 to 2011 patent meltdown period
with some promising new product introductions: Zytiga (abiraterone)
for hormone resistant prostate cancer, the anti-coagulant Xarelto
(rivaroxaban) and Incivo (telepravir) a protease inhibitor for
hepatitis C. Zytiga is off to an amazing start, but competition
from Medivation's MDV-3100 may slow growth in the period beyond
2014. Xarelto and BMY's Eliquis, both Factor Xa inhibitors have had
their issues with the FDA which is showing extreme caution with
these agents. Better clinical trial results have caused most
investors to consider Eliquis as the winner in this category, but
they may be underestimating Xarelto. Also Incivo (telepravir) got
off to a strong start, but very quickly new oral hepatitis C drugs
have shown such promise that most analysts look for Incivo to be
eclipsed in the period beyond 2014 when they enter the market.
My expectations for Zytiga, Xarelto and Incivo have been
downscaled for the period beyond 2014. However, JNJ continues to
beef up its pipeline and has a number of new drugs that will be
introduced over the next few years. I am particularly interested in
ibrutinib, which is licensed form Pharmacyclics (PCYC) that appears
to be a breakthrough for hematological tumors. This drug could have
more potential then Zytiga and perhaps has the commercial potential
of Rituxan (that is saying something as Rituxan is a $5+billion
drug). I am also intrigued with its second generation protease
inhibitor for hepatitis C, TMC-435; canagliflozin, a member of a
new oral drug class for treating diabetes; and the tuberculosis
drug TMC-207.
The following table shows the measured decline expected for
mature in-line products and the contribution of new, dynamic
products. They combine to produce sales growth of about 5% per year
over the next five years. However, these estimates do not include
any contributions from acquisitions and I think that there will be
acquisitions that could accelerate growth. There is also likely to
be more of a contribution from new products than I am showing.
| Table 2: Sales
Projections for Pharamaceuticals: 2011 to 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
| Mature Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Remicade |
4,592 |
6,066 |
6,196 |
6,290 |
6,385 |
6,250 |
| Procrit, Eprex |
1,623 |
1,400 |
1,171 |
1,009 |
832 |
775 |
| Risperdal Consta |
1,583 |
1,375 |
1,220 |
1,090 |
950 |
825 |
| Concerta |
1,268 |
1,027 |
780 |
732 |
712 |
700 |
| Levaquin |
623 |
85 |
45 |
36 |
28 |
22 |
| Duragesic |
588 |
450 |
377 |
325 |
285 |
257 |
| Risperdal |
542 |
397 |
288 |
237 |
198 |
167 |
| Topamax |
488 |
376 |
248 |
178 |
127 |
96 |
| Sub-total |
11,307 |
11,175 |
10,323 |
9,896 |
9,516 |
9,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Growth Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Stelara |
738 |
1,021 |
1,309 |
1,600 |
1,850 |
2,094 |
| Zytiga |
301 |
979 |
1,149 |
1,337 |
1,300 |
1,325 |
| Xarelto |
4 |
223 |
389 |
592 |
813 |
973 |
| Simponi |
410 |
524 |
618 |
706 |
799 |
909 |
| Velcade |
1,274 |
1,409 |
1,493 |
1,591 |
1,244 |
859 |
| Nucynta |
159 |
258 |
339 |
422 |
499 |
584 |
| Intelence |
314 |
369 |
395 |
442 |
487 |
535 |
| Endurant |
25 |
144 |
261 |
363 |
445 |
511 |
| Invega |
499 |
562 |
610 |
555 |
480 |
446 |
| Incivo |
64 |
639 |
689 |
664 |
545 |
405 |
| TMC-435 |
|
|
|
145 |
450 |
670 |
| ibrutinib |
|
|
|
|
50 |
600 |
| cangagliflozin |
|
|
|
25 |
175 |
425 |
| TMC-207 |
|
|
|
|
115 |
325 |
| Sub-total |
3,788 |
6,126 |
7,250 |
8,441 |
9,250 |
10,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Other |
9,271 |
8,575 |
9,347 |
10,001 |
11,001 |
11,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Sales |
24,366 |
25,876 |
26,920 |
28,337 |
29,767 |
31,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Source: SmithOnStocks
estimates |
|
|
|
|
MD&D
The MD&D segment has been flattish for some time, but the
acquisition of Synthes, which closed on June 14, 2012, should lead
to a resumption of growth in 2H, 2012 and into 2013 as it will add
$2 billion of high margin business in 2012 and $4 billion in 2013.
The withdrawal from the drug eluting stent business and the ASR hip
recall have had a negative effect on sales comparisons that is now
largely behind the company. There is also some evidence of a
stabilization of upturn in surgical procedures, a key driver of
MD& D results, which has been declining in recent years and
remains below pre-recession levels.
Management is predicting that Synthes will add about $0.03 to
2H, 2012 results and $0.10 to $0.15 to EPS in 2013. This
contribution is expected to come from sales growth rather than cost
cutting. However, there will be some efficiencies and management
noted some operational overlap with DePuy that could provide some
cost savings. Management said that the integration of Synthes is
going well, but noted some sales disruption as Synthes switches
from using distributors to direct sales in line with DePuy. This
bears watching.
Consumer
McNeil OTC re-launches have been slower than expected with most
of the re-launches expected to occur in 2013 as opposed to earlier
expectations for 2H, 2012. This may have reduced 2012 revenues by
$400 million, Management stated that it will carefully control
launch expenses in 2013 and does not expect this to impact overall
corporate earnings.
Disclosure:
I am long [[JNJ]], [[BMY]].
See also
4 Undervalued Small Cap Stocks With Cash
Reserves
on seekingalpha.com