Income investors have two equally important objectives when it
comes to investing -- obtaining high amounts of income and
Many survivors of the 2008 bear market learned this the hard
way. They found out that they must either balance the two, or
face heavy losses.
Case in point: Many investors jumped at abnormally high yields
in financial stocks like Citigroup (
) when its yield jumped above 10% shortly before the company
eliminated its dividend. And investors looking for a bargain in
General Electric (
) endured a dividend cut of almost 70%.
Remember, these are companies that were once widely assumed to
be among the safest in the world, yet they eliminated their
dividend practically overnight.
To be fair, these were also extraordinary circumstances that
happened during a financial crisis. But long-time income
investors still follow a general rule of thumb -- "The higher the
yield, the riskier the stock."
Today, I'm making an exception to this rule. As I mentioned to
few weeks ago
, there is a way to invest in stocks with great yields, but
without all the added risk that comes from dividend cuts.
Let me explain.
As you've probably heard in the past, high yields are often a
sign that a company is in trouble. And determining whether a high
dividend payout is sustainable can be challenging and usually
requires a detailed analysis of the company's financial
Wall Street firms employ analysts to do this task but their
research isn't widely available. Usually only large customers --
institutional investors, hedge funds and high net worth
individuals -- have access to this research, which gives those
investors a chance to sell ahead of dividend cuts.
But while you, the individual investor, can't always get Wall
Street firms to share their research, you
follow what the largest investors are doing by observing the
price action of individual stocks.
When hedge funds and other large investors are buying, we
should see the stock outperform the market. This can be measured
with an indicator known as relative strength (
Relative strength quantifies how any individual stock is
performing compared to all of the other stocks in the market. The
actions of large investors can be seen in RS. When they are
buying, the stock price should be rising, and when they are
selling, we will usually see the stock price lag the broader
market. RS summarizes this buying and selling pressure in a
Using RS to buy market leaders and avoid laggards is one of
the best ways I know of to beat the market.
It's such a powerful indicator, it could have told you exactly
when to buy and sell Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL), for example. The RS
indicator would have recommended buying Apple at a price of $460
per share in February 2012, when its RS was showing above 70 (I
recommend stocks with an RS over 70, which means they are
outperforming 70% of the market). After the purchase, we would
then hold onto our shares until RS fell below 70 -- the point
when Apple had become a laggard among larger investors -- when
Apple's share price reached $650.
If we sold at the $650 share price, we would have pocketed a
tidy 41% return in just eight months. That would be well before
the stock plummeted 31% to where it is today, languishing back
around $450 per share.
In other words, the RS indicator shows investors an ideal time
buy a stock, pocket gains -- plus any dividend income --
and sell long before they lose their shirts.
Unfortunately, there is never a free lunch on Wall Street --
using RS alone is only half of the work.
While high RS stocks can provide higher-than-average gains,
some come with a great deal of risk. For example, these could be
the kind of stocks that suffer large declines when the company
misses earnings estimates by a penny.
To help minimize this risk, I look for high RS stocks with
. When it comes to income stocks, I look for companies that have
increased their dividend payments during the past three years,
have sustainable yields and sport growing cash flow.
Companies with strong fundamentals in these areas tend to be
the biggest winners in the long run. Those looking closely would
have seen that fundamentals in both Citigroup and GE were
deteriorating in 2008 as their rising dividend yields made the
stocks look otherwise attractive to many investors.
Both relative strength and fundamental analysis have merit in
finding market-beating stocks, but what happens when we put these
two methods together?
After a great deal of research and testing, I created a
trading system that combines both relative strength and
fundamental analysis. I call it the "Maximum Profit" system.
Its rules help us identify stocks that are likely to
outperform the market during the next six months to a year with
The results from using this method have been outstanding --
over a decade-long test, the Maximum Profit system generated a
massive 571% total return. Its rules can be applied to any list
of stocks, and in every test I have run, the system beats the
market. This is true whether I test large caps or small caps,
growth or value stocks, or any other group.
And best of all, if the system recommends a dividend-paying
stock, the system's safeguards make it virtually
Here's an example of an ideal 'buy' for income investors using
the Maximum Profit system -- oil and gas partnership
Delek Logistics Partners (
. The company has a high RS of 77, which means it is
outperforming 77% of the market and is in favor with larger
investors. And even though the company has only been publicly
traded since 2012, its earnings have grown 44% a year since 2002.
Besides just being undervalued, it also pays a dividend yield of
Thanks to the system -- which puts this stock's relative
strength and strong fundamentals to the test constantly even
after I buy it -- I can hold onto a solid dividend stock like
this one without much worry. Even if things happen to go south
for this company, the system will tell me long before the stock
takes a plunge or cuts its dividend --
which could prevent me from losing thousands of
© Copyright 2001-2010 StreetAuthority, LLC. All Rights Reserved.