Charles Hugh Smith
Does the Chinese stock market presage the U.S. market's
direction? If so, the U.S. market is set for a fall.
The economies of China and the U.S. are in effect Siamese
Twins, joined at the hip.
By pegging their currency to the U.S. dollar, the Chinese central
government has tethered its economy to both U.S. policy and the
Since the U.S. economy is still considerably larger than
China's, and the yuan/renminbi is pegged to the dollar (and not
vice versa), then we might expect China's stock market to follow
the American market's lead.
As expected, the two markets are clearly correlated, often
acting in lockstep (both rising or falling together). But China's
markets also seem to act as the canary in the coalmine for the
U.S. markets, declining before U.S. markets plummet.
Volatility rules all markets nowadays.
China is certainly not exempt. On Monday,
China Stocks Plunge Most Since August on Property
, and then today Chinese property stocks soared because some
rumor claimed the government did not have the authority to impose
property taxes --
Chinese Property Shares Surge on Debunked Tax
Note to rumor mongers: China remains a command economy
ruled by an all-powerful Communist Party. It can impose property
taxes whenever it decides to do so.
If a rumor depending on the legal constraints of the Chinese
central government is needed to prop up Chinese real estate, then
the "rally" has the staying power of a leaf in the wind.
(The issue here is that there are no property taxes in China
now, so any imposition of a tax on real estate ownership would
raise the financial burdens of speculative ownership. Creating
property taxes would thus act as a disincentive to buying more
Let's look at some charts to see if China's market
tends to lead the U.S. market.
The best way to see if there is any relationship is to pull up
a chart of each market. I am using the S&P 500 as
representative of the U.S. stock market and the Xinhua China 25
) as a proxy for China's market. Before zooming in to look at
recent market action, I've chosen a longer-term 5-year chart of
(Click to enlarge)
As a simple indicator of each market's internal strength or
weakness, I've placed the 100-day moving average ((
)) on each chart. In technical terms, when price stays above a
long-term moving average, it is bullish; if price drops below the
moving average and can't reclaim a place above that trendline,
then it's bearish.
As we can see, China's stock market rocketed up in a
stupendous bubble, doubling and tripling on its ascent to a peak
in the week of October 16, 2007. Though the two indices don't
seem to have much in common at first glance--the FXI was a
bubble, the SPX a more leisurely Bull Market--the S&P 500
topped out just a few days before, on October 9, 2007, at
This tight correlation remained in place during the subsequent
declines and rallies which culminated in the waterfall of late
September, 2008. Though the Chinese market fluctuated much more
wildly in terms of percentage, the dips and recoveries are
remarkably aligned until mid-September, 2008, just before global
markets imploded in the wake of Lehman Brothers' collapse.
If we look closely at the fateful time just prior to the
global meltdown, the S&P 500 was still clinging to its
100-day moving average. In contrast, the Chinese market had
already sagged well below its 100-day MA. With the benefit of
hindsight, it is clear the weakness in China's stock market
preceded the cascade just ahead. (I have drawn in black lines to
mark the same time frame.)
Here is a close-up of September and October, 2008, with both
markets depicted on one chart. The price movement of each index
is plotted in percentage points.
The Chinese market weakened more than the S&P 500 right
from the start of September, but it was the steep drop in China
stocks around September 17, 2008 that was clearly a warning shot
that all was not well.
As late as October 12-13, China stocks rose sharply along with
U.S markets to "only" losing 20% of their value from September 1.
But the weakness presaged in September came back with a
vengeance, and the Chinese market plummeted to horrendous losses
What can we conclude from this study? That though Chinese and
American stock markets are highly correlated in terms of peaks
and valleys, relative weakness in Chinese stocks appears to have
offered a "heads-up" of trouble ahead for U.S. markets. While the
S&P500 clung to its 100-day moving average at the critical
juncture, China's market had already fallen well below its
100-day moving average.
Let's now turn our attention to more recent market action in
each of these markets: here is a chart depicting the FXI and
S&P 500 from May 16, 2009 to May 16, 2010.
The two markets were highly correlated, rising and falling in
near-perfect unison, until early December when the Chinese market
abruptly sank. In the subsequent weeks, the Chinese index
continued to underperform the S&P 500. While the S&P 500
registered a significant rise in that time frame, the Chinese
market has yet to recover positive territory.
Given the correlation revealed in the charts above, Chinese
stocks' relative weakness in the past five months should give
U.S. investors pause. China's weakness might not be the cause of
a steep decline in U.S. markets, but we ignore the correlation at
Sector Performance Year to Date and Percentage From