It's no secret that
U.S. oil production
is on the rise . . . so much so that North America could reach
energy independence before 2020. But a lesser-known fact is that
U.S. oil consumption is also picking back up, reversing a
downward trend that persisted until last year.
U.S. oil demand rose by 390,000 barrels per day in 2013,
according to recently released data from the International Energy
Agency (IEA). That 2% increase might not seem like a lot,
but it reversed a long-term trend of declining demand. And it
came as quite a surprise to many analysts following the energy
What's more, demand in the fourth quarter appears to have been
accelerating. And this has led the EIA to reverse its prior
forecast of lower demand in 2014 with one calling for yet another
year of higher consumption.
The implications of this emerging trend are far-reaching. It's
not just that Americans are buying more SUVs and cranking their
thermostats to combat a cold winter - although both are
contributing to some oil demand in recent months.
It's much more about the global shift in energy production and
consumption, and what it means for the economies of those
Growth in many
has been slowing. The "BRICs" - Brazil, Russia, India and China -
were responsible for much of the world's growth in oil
consumption over the last decade. But that is changing. According
oil demand in China in 2013 was the weakest it's been in six
years - just 295,000 barrels a day.
Meanwhile, the U.S. recovery has been helped along in no small
part because of its
. Exploration, production and distribution means, in part, job
growth. And it also means easy access to energy for the
recovering industries that need it.
Perhaps I'm simplifying this a bit too much. But the big
picture certainly shows that the U.S. economy is picking up
steam, albeit slowly, while many emerging markets are cooling
Is there a connection to oil production growth? I think it's a
fairly safe bet to say "yes." Domestic oil production gives
the U.S. a competitive advantage that it has lacked for decades.
And consumers and industries alike are taking advantage.
The next logical part of the discussion is what the U.S.
should do with excess crude
when it comes. There are a lot of people who think the country
would benefit from exporting excess production, and production of
lighter oil that may best be refined overseas.
Exporting crude would require that the U.S. government reverse
its ban on crude oil exports. The ban has been in place since the
1970s, but clearly a lot has changed since then.
There is going to be a lot of talk about this in 2014. For
energy investors, the takeaway message is that we need to
consider more than just the U.S. production growth angle. There
is the consumption angle, too. And that angle is one
we haven't had to consider, given that demand was in decline.
Now, we need to broaden our perspective. I'll have more to say
about this in the coming months.
Income From Pipelines: the Safest Energy
Most investors hope to "catch a flier" on small, risky
exploration companies who usually don't have a drop of oil in
their wells. But in our experience, people don't build pipelines
until they know when and how much oil they'll pump. Which makes
pipeline stocks the least risky investments in the entire energy
sector. No pipes - no oil.
Click here to read my full write-up
on two American pipeline stocks paying big (and growing)