SL
Advisors
submits:
By Henry Hoffman
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (
RQI
) is a closed-end fund ((
CEF
)) that invests in public real estate equities in the United States
and is managed by Cohen and Steers. Cohen and Steers is a well
known investment manager specializing in income generating equity
securities including real estate, large cap value stocks,
infrastructure and preferred securities. Unlike open-end mutual
funds which issue and redeem shares and thus trade at the value of
the assets it holds, closed-end funds have a limited number of
shares that are not redeemable for the underlying securities or
cash (except in liquidations when the fund distributes all assets).
Therefore, CEFs can trade at prices dislocated from the value of
the securities held by the fund, known as its net asset value ((
NAV
)). In the case of RQI, shares trade for 15% less than the net
value of its assets.
There are many reasons why CEFs can trade at large discounts or
premiums to NAV. Some are more or less theoretically justified,
such as liquidity, management's ability to generate competitive
returns, management fees, corporate governance and leverage. Other
reasons appear to be more a reflection of the preferences or even
misunderstandings of investors, such as distribution rates and
general sentiment. It seems the latter has been the cause of RQI's
large discount to NAV. The once sought after real estate sector has
been out of favor among investors leading to both depressed REIT
security valuations and doubly mirrored in the discounts of real
estate themed closed-end funds. Also, similar to the reaction in
other CEFs that cut distributions over the last couple years,
investors dumped RQI shares following quarterly distribution cuts
in 4Q08 from $0.15/share to $0.133/share then another reduction
in1Q09 to $0.0933/share leading to brief discounts in excess of
30%.
The wide discount to the easily calculated underlying publically
listed equities creates a buying opportunity in RQI shares. The
poor investor sentiment is already reflected in the prices for the
underlying securities and an additionally discount of 15% is
unwarranted, in our opinion, particularly because RQI is large,
liquid, transparent and shareholder friendly (at least relative to
their peer group). Furthermore, based on recent actions, it appears
that Cohen & Steers is focused on narrowing the discount. They
have authorized large share repurchase programs and recently
increased the quarterly dividend to $0.18/share from $0.933 giving
shares a dividend yield of 9.5% today.
Repurchasing shares is a wonderful way to return value to
shareholders of a closed-end fund trading at a discount. It both
raises the NAV per share for the fund and narrows the discount for
shareholders. However, often fund managements do not see it to be
in their own interest as it also lowers the assets under
management, which the typical asset manager's fee is based upon.
The Cohen & Steers funds have taken the higher road and their
closed end funds have been authorized to repurchase up to 10% of
outstanding common shares each calendar year. As seen in the table
below, managers are using this authorization to continue to
repurchase shares during the second quarter. Management repurchased
390,500 shares (approx. $2.8 million) of RQI over the course of the
second quarter which traded at an average discount to NAV of
17.3%.
|
Cohen & Steers Fund
|
NYSE Symbol
|
Shares Repurchased During 2Q10
|
Shares Acquired Since Inception
|
|
Dividend Majors
|
[[DVM]]
|
37,000
|
120,700
|
|
Global Income Builder
|
[[INB]]
|
0
|
323,600
|
|
Infrastructure
|
[[UTF]]
|
221,000
|
221,000
|
|
Quality Income Realty
|
[[RQI]]
|
390,500
|
390,500
|
|
REIT and Preferred Income
|
[[RNP]]
|
120,500
|
120,500
|
The distribution yield as a percentage of NAV is seemingly one
of the most indicative factors of a closed-end funds discount to
NAV. Interestingly, investors seem to ignore whether the
distribution is paid from net investment income or simply a return
of investors capital. In any case, shareholders bid up prices of
CEFs that pay larger distributions. Last week, Cohen & Steers
raised the distribution on six of its seven CEFs, essentially
doubling it for RQI. Not only does this resonate positively for
yield seeking investors but also speaks to management's positive
sector outlook.
|
Cohen & Steers Fund
|
NYSE Symbol
|
June 2010 Quarterly Distribution Per Share
|
September 2010 Quarterly Distribution Per Share
|
Annualized Yield to Price*
|
Annualized Yield to NAV*
|
|
Opportunity
|
[[FOF]]
|
$0.23
|
$0.26
|
8.3%
|
7.6%
|
|
Dividend Majors
|
[[DVM]]
|
$0.125
|
$0.23
|
8.2%
|
7.0%
|
|
Global Income Builder
|
[[INB]]
|
$0.28
|
$0.28
|
9.9%
|
10.0%
|
|
Infrastructure
|
[[UTF]]
|
$0.24
|
$0.36
|
9.2%
|
8.1%
|
|
Quality Income Realty
|
[[RQI]]
|
$0.0925
|
$0.18
|
9.5%
|
8.0%
|
|
REIT and Preferred Income
|
[[RNP]]
|
$0.20
|
$0.30
|
9.3%
|
8.0%
|
|
Total Return Realty
|
[[RFI]]
|
$0.125
|
$0.22
|
7.5%
|
7.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Source: Morningstar's FundData
To determine an appropriate current market discount target for
RQI, we compare its current yield to other CEFs that also focus on
public real estate equities in the United States. Isolating the
sector, and taking into account RQI's positive alpha over 1 and
3-yr periods, diversified portfolio, large relative asset size,
repurchase program, and larger than average distribution on NAV
yield; RQI's recent distribution increase suggests share price
appreciation of at least 7% versus its peers. Meanwhile, RQI
shareholders will collect the 9.5% dividend yield.
|
Fund
|
Symbol
|
Yield to NAV
|
Discount to NAV
|
Market Cap ($millions)
|
|
Cohen & Steers Qty Inc Realty
|
[[RQI]]
|
8.0%
|
-14.9%
|
868
|
|
Cohen & Steers REIT & Preferred
|
[[RNP]]
|
8.0%
|
-14.3%
|
638
|
|
Cohen & Steers Tot Ret Realty
|
[[RFI]]
|
7.0%
|
-8.3%
|
112
|
|
LMP Real Estate Income
|
[[RIT]]
|
6.9%
|
-11.7%
|
108
|
|
Neuberger Berman Real Estate
|
[[NRO]]
|
5.9%
|
-11.1%
|
240
|
|
Nuveen Real Estate Income
|
[[JRS]]
|
9.4%
|
7.2%
|
288
|
|
Avg ex RQI
|
|
7.5%
|
-7.6%
|
277
|
Disclosure:
Author long RQI with hedge
See also
Is the Fed Crossing the Line?
on seekingalpha.com