Sometimes, it is worth remembering that rarely is a free lunch
given out on Wall Street. That is another way of saying that when a
trading idea appears overly logical on a fundamental basis, it
probably is and that idea is likely doomed to provide investors
with frustration and a smaller brokerage account.
Worse yet, the array of all-too-logical trading ideas is not
confined to one sector. In fact, these suckers bets are scattered
throughout a variety of sectors and industry groups. With that many
potholes out there, it is a worthwhile exercise to look back at
some failed, obvious ideas so similar mistakes can be avoided in
are particularly useful for this endeavor because investors
frequently used these products over single stocks to express broad,
thematic views such as increased consumer spending in emerging
markets and rising energy prices following a natural disaster. With
that in mind, here are some of the obvious ETF trading ideas that
are showing signs of being epic fails.
Short Aerospace ETFs What that means is that plenty of
commentators and investors thought that aerospace stocks would be
rocked by the massive reductions in government spending should the
fiscal cliff come to pass. What has made this trade particularly
frustrating is the politicians from both parties have warmed to at
least some reductions in defense spending.
Using November 7, the day after Election Day, as the time when
fiscal cliff fears really took off, it should be noted that the
PowerShares Aerospace & Defense Portfolio (NYSE:
) and the iShares Dow Jones US Aerospace & Defense Index Fund
) are both modestly higher.
Since late November, PPA is up almost 2.8 percent while ITA is
higher by 2.5 percent, moves that show these ETFs have defied all
common logic when it comes to the fiscal cliff. Those gains also
indicate that traders that shorted these ETFs on fiscal cliff
headlines might want to cover those positions as both funds reside
about one percent from their recently set 52-week highs.
Rising Food Demand Upon entering the phrase "ETFs for food"
(take off the quotation marks) into Google, one will see that it
takes a mere 0.24 seconds for 37.1 million results to be returned.
What that says is that the topic of rising global food demand has
been addressed as a trading idea plenty of times.
On the surface, this is not a bad idea if for no other reason
than that global food demand is rising. However, the problem is the
ETFs used to exploit this theme. One of those products is the iPath
DJ-UBS Livestock TR Sub-Index ETN (NYSE:
), which tracks live cattle and lean hogs futures contracts. That
would appear to make COW a great play on increased food demand and
higher livestock prices,
but this ETN has a reputation for
Over the past five years, it is fair to say that global beef
demand has increased. Yet over that time, COW has plunged 40
Another ETF that is often mentioned as a play on rising food
demand is the Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF (NYSE:
). To be fair, MOO has delivered solid gains in 2012, but the fund
has also lagged the S&P 500. With potash prices tumbling,
MOO is vulnerable to being laggard again in
That is not even the biggest issue with MOO, though. It is the
ETF's volatility relative to the returns it offers. Over the past
five years, MOO has surged 22.4 percent, but with volatility of
24.7 percent. On the other hand, the SPDR S&P 500 (NYSE:
) is higher by 33.9 percent with volatility of 18.3 percent.
Investors looking to tap the "people have to eat theme" would do
better with the Consumer Staples Select SPDR (NYSE:
). Over the past five years, XLP has returned 42.3 percent with
volatility of just 12.3 percent.
For more on ETFs, click
(c) 2012 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice.
All rights reserved.
Profit with More New & Research
. Gain access to a streaming platform with all the information you
need to invest better today.
Click here to start your 14 Day Trial of Benzinga